Tuesday, January 11, 2022

Digest for rec.food.cooking@googlegroups.com - 8 updates in 4 topics

Lucretia Borgia <lucretiaborgia@fl.it>: Jan 11 03:45PM -0400


>> I was responding to the Richard Dimbleby reference.
 
>He was a BBC TV presenter extrordinaire and something went wrong in the
>studio and he used it as an expletive.
 
It's just occurred to me that perhaps in NA 'Jesus wept' is not an
expletive, I don't think I have heard anyone use it here when I
consider it.
Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 12 06:45AM +1100

>>Fucks
>>Sake
 
>Who doesn't know that and has been online before?
 
People don't talk like that in the Little House On The Prairie.
 
--
This is NOT a post by Dave Smith
Lucretia Borgia <lucretiaborgia@fl.it>: Jan 11 03:46PM -0400

>vaccine (never mind TESTING properly, which takes years) for a virus
>where they had never succeeded previously (despite the massive profits
>it would bring) for many decades was a red flag.
 
When they started talking success here it was said that Pfizer in
particular was already working on MRNA and triumphed to find it worked
on Covid 19
Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 12 06:46AM +1100

On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 15:41:50 -0400, Lucretia Borgia
>percentage is. There is some guesswork that by studying what has
>happened in the southern hemisphere, they are about to cover what will
>happen in the northern hemisphere winter.
 
Can't we turn that around?
 
--
This is NOT a post by Dave Smith
Jeßus <j@j.net>: Jan 12 06:50AM +1100

On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 15:46:38 -0400, Lucretia Borgia
 
>When they started talking success here it was said that Pfizer in
>particular was already working on MRNA and triumphed to find it worked
>on Covid 19
 
Yes, they DID say that later down the track, when people started
asking questions. So WHY didn't they use this same technology
previously? Because previous tests had shown it to have unknown risks.
It still needed/needs further testing. it takes years to decades to do
so properly. I'm amused at your usage of 'triumphed'. Sounds like
something straight from the media.
Sheldon Martin <penmart01@aol.com>: Jan 11 02:43PM -0500

On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 09:59:29 -0800 (PST), dsi1
 
>> >https://photos.app.goo.gl/bG9qiKaWahFUsGed6
>> So long as you use google I'll never see your photos.
 
>That's not a big deal to me. Is it to you?
 
I don't appreciate having to enter my personal information to see your
pictures.
Cindy Hamilton <angelicapaganelli@yahoo.com>: Jan 11 11:00AM -0800

On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 1:00:31 PM UTC-5, Sheldon wrote:
 
> >Cindy Hamilton
> I leave my reusable bags in my car. I prefer the checker return my
> checked groceries to my cart.
 
Not really feasible with the kind of checkstands used at my grocery store:
<https://www.roystonllc.com/products/checkstands/189-carousel-1>
 
The cashier is nowhere near the cart.
 
Anyway, do you stand around in the cold, rain, heat, whatever bagging
your groceries while standing net to your car? Just bag your own groceries
in the store. What a maroon.
 
Cindy Hamilton
Cindy Hamilton <angelicapaganelli@yahoo.com>: Jan 11 10:57AM -0800

On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 1:00:05 PM UTC-5, Mike Duffy wrote:
 
> Even if you crack the seal to avoid painful burns due to superheating,
> the plastic is not rated for microwaves. Sir, would you like toxic
> polymers with that?
 
It's bowser. Troll Lite.
 
Cindy Hamilton
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.food.cooking+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No comments:

Post a Comment