- Omicron - 12 Updates
- I ate up ALL of the green beans I had today! - 7 Updates
- Pot roast tonight - 1 Update
- I RIPPED TIT on my Nordictrack! 15+15mins! :-) - 1 Update
- Sunday Brunch - 1 Update
- Wood rolling pin - 1 Update
- People SUCK! - 2 Updates
| Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca>: Jan 13 04:12PM -0700 On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 15:09:03 -0500, Michael Trew wrote: > fact, and didn't teach alternative theories. I suspect that some of > those teachers agreed with me, on some level. I was in public schooling > from 4th grade through the end of high school. I suggest you do some research into the meaning of "theory" as used in science. It NOT some fanciful idea or hypothesis but a MODEL to explain a series of observations, modifiable as more data are revealed. The evidence for Evolution is now so overwhelming that it can very safely be treated as FACT! |
| Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca>: Jan 13 04:18PM -0700 On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 15:13:53 -0500, Michael Trew wrote: >> Your level of ignorance and thick-headedness is so profound that it's >> pointless trying to educate you. > "Can't be bothered" is akin to laziness. I'm far too busy with colleagues working on a research project that will eventually be published, after peer review. > You have a tendency to quickly > get aggravated in any discussion here, post a snippy response, and then > flee. Why waste words? > I'm not announcing my theories as set in fact; I'm simply pointing out > another angle of thought. If you think that I am entirely > unapproachable and ignorant, then you are a poor judge of character. But questining Evolution by bringing up biblical mythology only confirms your ignorance. |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 14 10:20AM +1100 >series of observations, modifiable as more data are revealed. >The evidence for Evolution is now so overwhelming that it can very safely >be treated as FACT! Oops, you said the evil word: "fact". Now he'll never believe you. Facts are communist inventions. -- This is NOT a post by Dave Smith |
| Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca>: Jan 13 04:20PM -0700 On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 15:18:09 -0500, Michael Trew wrote: > basically comparing two identical twins, and then saying that they are > essentially the same person. Meanwhile, they have entirely different > thoughts, feelings, personalities, etc. Human beings share 50% of their DNA with the banana. It seems to be more evident in your case:-) |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 13 06:20PM -0500 On 2022-01-13 6:12 p.m., Graham wrote: > series of observations, modifiable as more data are revealed. > The evidence for Evolution is now so overwhelming that it can very safely > be treated as FACT! I don't understand physics, astrophysics, biochemistry, tectonic plate movement. Therefore..... there is a god who created us. |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 13 06:24PM -0500 On 2022-01-13 6:18 p.m., Graham wrote: >> unapproachable and ignorant, then you are a poor judge of character. > But questining Evolution by bringing up biblical mythology only confirms > your ignorance. You can lead a whore to culture but you can't make her think. |
| "itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net" <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Jan 13 03:26PM -0800 On Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 4:23:25 PM UTC-6, Hank Rogers wrote: > If you were older, you could have made a big difference in the > scopes monkey trial decades ago in alabama. Dayton, Tennessee |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 14 10:32AM +1100 >> thoughts, feelings, personalities, etc. >Human beings share 50% of their DNA with the banana. It seems to be more >evident in your case:-) Are you calling him a crook? -- This is NOT a post by Dave Smith |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 14 10:32AM +1100 On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:24:20 -0500, Dave Smith >> But questining Evolution by bringing up biblical mythology only confirms >> your ignorance. >You can lead a whore to culture but you can't make her think. Criticising Michael ok, but a whore? -- This is NOT a post by Dave Smith |
| Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid>: Jan 13 05:47PM -0600 Michael Trew wrote: >>> yields 3.46 >>> shots / day. > Wow. I misspelled my own name. Perhaps you got off at the Willoughby station in 1890? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Stop_at_Willoughby You may be young, but you have chosen old. That's OK. I'm old too, and I still have one very old horse left. we are both waiting to die. |
| Bryan Simmons <bryangsimmons@gmail.com>: Jan 13 04:03PM -0800 On Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 12:08:14 PM UTC-6, Cindy Hamilton wrote: > Between any two humans, the amount of genetic variation is about 0.1%. > Or about half the difference between humans and chimps. > Every species is distinct. Humans aren't special. This is why evolution is the only "theory." In the scientific method, one comes up with an hypothesis, an idea based on information, some of which, sometimes, is intuition, which is a product of information that the person can't really explain the logic to. Anyway, then the person, let's call him Joe, tries through observation and/or experimentation, to disprove. If he can't find evidence that the hypothesis is false, he shares what he has with other scientists. Mark then tries to prove the hypothesis to be incorrect, and perhaps he also fails to prove the null hypothesis. Then MaryAnn comes up with an idea to prove the null hypothesis. She tests by experimentation and/or observation, but she also fails to prove that Joe's hypothesis was incorrect. Then Harold thinks that he can design an experiment to prove Joe's idea was bogus. He does his experiment, but also fails. Now, the race is on to be the one who can knock a hole in Joe's hypothesis. Jacqueline asks David, her PhD thesis advisor, if she can design a study to confirm the null hypothesis using a new experimental technique she thought up, and David agrees that her idea might be just the thing that could confirm the null hypothesis, and agrees, but suggests that she work with another graduate student, Abdul, who is especially talented at statistical analysis. Jacqueline and Abdul design a study that challenges what they see as a possible flaw in the hypothesis. It is a well designed study, and the two work their butts off trying to prove that Joe's hypothesis was incorrect, but they also fail to find evidence that supports the null hypothesis. Jacqueline earns her PhD, because her unique method for attempting to disprove Joe's idea is novel, and perhaps could be applied to other related research in her field, and Abdul uses his participation in the study to demonstrate his skills in statistical analysis, and writes his Master's thesis on the application of those skills to what seems like an emerging Theory. With every effort to prove Joe's hypothesis incorrect having failed, it becomes statistically more likely that Joe was correct. That's how science works. Jeffrey can't accept that this Theory is correct because it conflicts with the traditionally accepted *truths* from his religion. He isn't a scientist, and can't put together a well designed study to disprove Joe's idea, but instead comes up with arguments to *prove* that his way of thinking makes more sense. He tries to find evidence to prove that the old way of thinking is correct. He never tries to prove that his idea is incorrect. He tries to find alternative evidence that might cast doubt upon Joe's "Theory," but he never tries to prove that his own idea is incorrect, because doing so would put his faith in his mythology "to the test," and that is forbidden in his religious tradition. All of the fancy technology that he relies upon in day to day life was developed through the scientific method, not direct revelation from a supreme being, or reliance upon ancient scriptures, but Jeffrey can't accept that those scriptures might not be factually correct. --Bryan |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 13 05:34PM -0700 On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 10:32:58 +1100, Dave Smith >>> your ignorance. >>You can lead a whore to culture but you can't make her think. >Criticising Michael ok, but a whore? Uhm, Dit is mijn kikker. Ghe Ghe Ghe. -- This is NOT a post by Dave Smith |
| jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net>: Jan 13 06:36PM -0500 On 1/12/2022 6:56 PM, John Kuthe wrote: > As the Veggie of the Day for my Vegetarian STD Meal! > John Kuthe, RN, BSN... Awww. Everyone needs to look at the little boy who ate all his green beans! LOL Jill |
| "itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net" <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Jan 13 03:45PM -0800 > Awww. Everyone needs to look at the little boy who ate all his green > beans! LOL > Jill Next he'll tell us he didn't wet his bed and slept all night without changing his sheets. |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 14 10:47AM +1100 On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:36:40 -0500, jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote: >> John Kuthe, RN, BSN... >Awww. Everyone needs to look at the little boy who ate all his green >beans! LOL And you do! That's very sweet of you. -- This is NOT a post by Dave Smith |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 14 10:48AM +1100 On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 15:45:26 -0800 (PST), "itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net" >> Jill >Next he'll tell us he didn't wet his bed and slept all night without >changing his sheets. SPOILER ALERT! -- This is NOT a post by Dave Smith |
| Bryan Simmons <bryangsimmons@gmail.com>: Jan 13 04:13PM -0800 > > John Kuthe, RN, BSN... > Awww. Everyone needs to look at the little boy who ate all his green > beans! LOL Look, newsgroup. I ate up all of my green beans! No, John, is is you who is "all ate up." https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=all%20ate%20up You don't have the judgement not to post your pervert shit to Usenet. --Bryan |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 13 05:33PM -0700 On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 10:48:14 +1100, Dave Smith >>Next he'll tell us he didn't wet his bed and slept all night without >>changing his sheets. >SPOILER ALERT! Uhm, Dit is mijn kikker. Ghe Ghe Ghe. -- This is NOT a post by Dave Smith |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 13 05:33PM -0700 On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 10:47:35 +1100, Dave Smith >>Awww. Everyone needs to look at the little boy who ate all his green >>beans! LOL >And you do! That's very sweet of you. Uhm, Dit is mijn kikker. Ghe Ghe Ghe. -- This is NOT a post by Dave Smith |
| Ed Pawlowski <esp@snet.xxx>: Jan 13 07:26PM -0500 I've not made it for a long time since it is quite a bit for one person. I have plenty of leftovers and will freeze some for the future. This was a peice of chuck. I would prefer a rump roast but none were available. https://postimg.cc/RNkXHB8g |
| Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid>: Jan 13 06:06PM -0600 Mike Duffy wrote: > I'm not suggesting you use smileys, but surely there must be a way of > rephrasing your insults to John to make it less difficult for those who > would belittle the already-limited level of respect you curry here. Indeed. Master druce will be *very* upset. Something tells me that brian doesn't really give a shit. I doubt he cares what newcomers think either. Brian hates kuth and kuth loves brian, You can't change that. Perhaps I am wrong. |
| "itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net" <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Jan 13 03:42PM -0800 On Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 3:29:42 PM UTC-6, GM wrote: > How is your kitty doing, Joan...??? > -- > GM She is super sweet and like all cats just loves to be petted and brushed and played with. She loves to walk in front of me and stop wanting to play. She loves to get under my nightgown when I'm walking like she thinks she's hiding. |
| "itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net" <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Jan 13 03:34PM -0800 On Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 9:43:07 AM UTC-6, Dave Smith wrote: > And then rinse and rinse and rinse to get the stink of chlorine off it > or anything you cut on it will taste like it was cooked in a swimming > pool. Vinegar will be just as effective and not leave that horrible taste. I just use a drizzle of bleach straight from the bleach bottle then scrub with a brush, dishwashing liquid, and scalding hot water. Cutting board is left to air dry in the dish drainer after a thorough rinsing with hot water and I've never noticed an off taste. |
| jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net>: Jan 13 06:21PM -0500 On 1/12/2022 7:20 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: >> Jill > Trinity is my grandson's dog. You can call him but he never calls back. > That is probably who John called. When I had a dog he never called me, either. ;) Jill |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 14 10:31AM +1100 On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:21:09 -0500, jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote: >> Trinity is my grandson's dog. You can call him but he never calls back. >> That is probably who John called. >When I had a dog he never called me, either. ;) Our cat called me and woke me up this morning. I'd have slept another hour otherwise. -- This is NOT a post by Dave Smith |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.food.cooking+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment