- Omicron - 10 Updates
- Mississippi Pot Roast - 3 Updates
- OT: RIP Betty White - 1 Update
- I had such a GREAT ORGASM yesterday! YUM!! :-) - 4 Updates
- Lemme get this straight. - 5 Updates
- Ahhh! A Vegetarian STD Meal of Green Beans and Asparagus... - 2 Updates
| US Janet <USJanet@jan6noplace.com>: Jan 11 11:57AM -0700 >> It is a Bible quote. >> Janet US >I know that but I used it as an expletive to the whole of Joan's post. I was responding to the Richard Dimbleby reference. |
| Jeßus <j@j.net>: Jan 12 06:02AM +1100 On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 03:13:13 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >> Statistically, your son's friend will be fine. >Statistically, we won't get covid, yet there's a chance that we might have it. If we do get it, we probably won't need to be hospitalized. If we are hospitalized, we probably won't die - there is a chance that we could have long term effects that could linger. Mostly, we're betting that if we do get it, we won't need hospitalization, and we won't have long term effects. >Mostly, you're betting that you won't get it. I suppose it helps a lot if you deny that there's a problem at all. My guess is that most of the people that are in the hospital were betting on that too. LOL. |
| Jeßus <j@j.net>: Jan 12 06:04AM +1100 >Well said, Joan. These vaccines were emergency approved and they're not >working. Maybe someday, after 300 more booster shots, people will >finally realize that they followed the wrong piper. https://vimeo.com/663453583 |
| Jeßus <j@j.net>: Jan 12 06:09AM +1100 On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 05:50:26 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton >> Statistically, your son's friend will be fine. >Statistically, we're all unlikely to die in a traffic accident. >Yet we still wear our seat belts. That's just stupid. But OK. |
| Jeßus <j@j.net>: Jan 12 06:13AM +1100 On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:11:09 -0500, Dave Smith >infections. Back in mid November the numbers got down to single digits. >Then the started rising and for the last week they have been up around >400. There is no doubt that it is scary but it is not a scare tactic. The number of infections isn't really important when current variant is so harmless. Viruses tend to become more contagious and less harmful as a survival strategy. Don't let them scare you with these numbers. |
| Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca>: Jan 11 12:30PM -0700 On 2022-01-11 11:57 a.m., US Janet wrote: >>> Janet US >> I know that but I used it as an expletive to the whole of Joan's post. > I was responding to the Richard Dimbleby reference. He was a BBC TV presenter extrordinaire and something went wrong in the studio and he used it as an expletive. |
| Jeßus <j@j.net>: Jan 12 06:34AM +1100 On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:43:44 -0800 (PST), "itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net" >in the CDC and WHO with these daily scare tactics. Then slowly, ever >so slowly, they found out the quarantine period wasn't 2 weeks or more. >Then it was down to 7 days and now it's down 3 days. For me, it was the moment they started talking vaccines, circa May 2020. I knew enough to know that the idea of creating an effective vaccine (never mind TESTING properly, which takes years) for a virus where they had never succeeded previously (despite the massive profits it would bring) for many decades was a red flag. >already in bad health. Deadly to the younger members of society that >had underlying health problems and those who suffered with respiratory >problems/smokers. Yes. Statistically some people will die from almost anything. Statistically this virus doesn't warrant the response it is getting, IMO. I think it was 2017, Australia had over 8000 people hospitalized for the flu, but it barely made the news. we've had viruses equally bad and yet they didn't and still do not matter? Only C-19 matters? |
| Jeßus <j@j.net>: Jan 12 06:38AM +1100 On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:48:10 -0800 (PST), "itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net" >I see it all the time people screaming about religious zealots and the ones >screaming are just as much a zealot but in the opposite direction. But they >are always blissfully unaware of their own opinions and actions. Yes. It's like Richard Dawkins. It's not that I disagree with him, but him acting like a total dick when criticising those who believe in religion... well, what does that achieve? He's not changing anyone's mind behaving in that way. |
| Jeßus <j@j.net>: Jan 12 06:40AM +1100 On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 04:21:06 -0500, "itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net" >For >Fucks >Sake Who doesn't know that and has been online before? |
| Lucretia Borgia <lucretiaborgia@fl.it>: Jan 11 03:41PM -0400 On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:35:53 -0700, US Janet <USJanet@jan6noplace.com> wrote: >medicine has exceptions and risks. You need to find a better >argument. >Janet US Yes, every year as the flu shots emerge they tell us how high the percentage is. There is some guesswork that by studying what has happened in the southern hemisphere, they are about to cover what will happen in the northern hemisphere winter. Generally they seem to guess well :) |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 12 06:01AM +1100 On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:43:39 -0700, bob <bobsmith@sympatico.com> wrote: >It's out there. Simply marketing. A lot of hands will reach for Au Jus >gravy before Brown gravy.. They are probably exactly the same >ingredients. It's a weird use of French. Literally translated 'au jus' means 'in juice'. So when you ask for extra 'au jus' in a restaurant, you're asking for more 'in juice'. And an 'au jus gravy mix' is an 'in juice gravy mix'. -- This is NOT a post by Dave Smith |
| Cindy Hamilton <angelicapaganelli@yahoo.com>: Jan 11 11:03AM -0800 On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 12:37:04 PM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote: > I use my grandmother's Club Aluminum Dutch oven. It is at least 90 > years old and makes great pot roast on the stove top. Better than any > slow cooker. My daughter has dibs on it when I go. I prefer braising in the oven. The all-round heat gives a great result. Cindy Hamilton |
| Sheldon Martin <penmart01@aol.com>: Jan 11 02:41PM -0500 On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 13:37:38 -0500, "itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net" >On 1/11/2022 12:42 PM, Sheldon Martin <penmart01@aol.com> wrote: >> So long as you use google I'll never see your photos. >Says the dinosaur that's still using AOL. I tried other carriers, I see nothing wrong with AOL. I'll admit that AOL used to offer a lot more content but it's still fine for my needs. |
| Jeßus <j@j.net>: Jan 12 06:40AM +1100 On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 01:06:21 -0800 (PST), Thomas Joseph >I hate sounding like a phony. I don't mind being a phony, I just don't want to be seen as one by other people. But I don't want to give the false impression that I am against owning things. I am as materialistic as the next guy - I'm just not going to work my ass off to prove it. If it comes my way I'll take it. But not always. When I drove a cab in L.A., the sons of the guy from whom I leased the cab asked me if I wanted a car they'd been working on. I saw it. I would have taken it back when I wasn't working and didn't care as much about losing it to mechanical failure. I told the kid I was grateful but he should give it to someone who could take care of it - and that person is not me. I knew I could not afford the maintenance. So I rejected it. I am proud it, even boastful. At the same time, rest assured I am stressed out by the need to buy things, and become very impatient when shopping, which often result in stupid purchases. I went to a store today for long johns >and it was a chore. Stuff is so cheaply made yet so expensive, at least by my standards. So for me it's back to the thrift stores where you don't always find what you want, but when you do it's usually good quality and superior to new and improved bullshit. Thanks for your post. >Which two countries? Australia and Thailand. |
| John Kuthe <jwk6680@bjc.org>: Jan 11 11:00AM -0800 On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 2:13:54 AM UTC-6, Dave Smith wrote: > >>> And my Glabrous Nads are the best to pet to get to sleep! > >> YUM? You drink your own semen now? > >He has admitted to tasting it. ... Yes when I was about 12, VERY flexible and actually ejaculated into my mouth, which was fun for about as long as my orgasm lasted, and then I had this wet stuff in my my mouth! And yes I swallowed! :-) John Kuthe, RN, BSN... |
| "itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net" <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Jan 11 02:06PM -0500 On 1/11/2022 1:53 PM, Je�us wrote: >>> YUM? You drink your own semen now? >> He has admitted to tasting it. > I guess I shouldnt be surprised. When a guy gives me an orgasm I'm expected to swallow it? |
| Jeßus <j@j.net>: Jan 12 06:27AM +1100 On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:10:48 -0800 (PST), John Kuthe <jwk6680@bjc.org> wrote: >> >NO! Freshly bathed doubly shaved Nads! Extra Glabrously Silky Smooth! :-) >> I envy your incredible lifestyle. >That is just a personal grooming preference! Skydiving and then Whitewater Kayaking for 20 years is incredible. Why don't you do it again? No need to live in the past. >I've shaved my scrotum since I was 19! But I progressed to 100% fully shaved in the year 2000 or so, and it's my first morning shave! You shave more than once a day? |
| John Kuthe <jwk6680@bjc.org>: Jan 11 11:29AM -0800 > >> He has admitted to tasting it. > > I guess I shouldnt be surprised. > When a guy gives me an orgasm I'm expected to swallow it? If you are really into it, yes please! John Kuthe, RN, BSN... |
| Jeßus <j@j.net>: Jan 12 05:57AM +1100 >your own - "Bruce" or pick a new name (not one of the regular posters). >The troll will find you quickly anyway. No need to drag the real Dave >Smith into all of this mess. He's sorry for just *having* to pick Dave to forge again. He's lost his mind. |
| GM <gregorymorrowchicago07@gmail.com>: Jan 11 11:08AM -0800 Jeßus wrote: > >Smith into all of this mess. > He's sorry for just *having* to pick Dave to forge again. He's lost > his mind. Like an alkie or a druggie who blames everybody but themselves for why "people are BETRAYING ME...!!!"... Lol... -- GM |
| Jeßus <j@j.net>: Jan 12 06:18AM +1100 On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:38:38 -0500, Dave Smith >who to the best of my knowledge is already filtered. He did it before >and he admitted that it was wrong and apologized. Now he says he is >apologizing for something that he is still doing. No amount of trying to reason with him will work. He doesn't care. He's never cared about the people in RFC. In his twisted mind he can do no wrong. He's the 'victim' here and so the end justifies the means. All he cares about is being able to continue to troll people here. |
| Jeßus <j@j.net>: Jan 12 06:20AM +1100 On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:44:02 -0500, Dave Smith >me. Other people filtered you because you were doing the same to them. >You then nymshifted to get past the filters and claimed that you did it >because we had dared to talk about you when we had you filtered. Yep. He can justify anything (if it benefits himself of course) in his own mind. |
| Jeßus <j@j.net>: Jan 12 06:25AM +1100 On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 17:50:06 -0000 (UTC), heyjoe <this@is.invalid> wrote: >> I don't think there is a single person her how has any use for you at all. >DING Ding ding >We have a wqinner! Apart from that functional idiot who posts as 'Ophelia', of course. |
| Jeßus <j@j.net>: Jan 12 06:01AM +1100 >> Another stupid Youtube video. :( >> Jill > From what I've seen, most all youtube videos are worthless. Yes, better stick with TV. |
| Jeßus <j@j.net>: Jan 12 06:08AM +1100 >In article <srjo6o$l2a$1@dont-email.me>, g.majors@att.net says... >> From what I've seen, most all youtube videos are worthless. > Still on dial-up? You don't know what you've missed. 40 million YT channels and Gary can't find anything he likes... The great irony being there isn't a single TV program on air anywhere that has higher ratings than millions of YT channels do. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.food.cooking+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment