- OT: I just commited a radical political act! I VOTED!! - 7 Updates
- Leftover Duck recipes? - 5 Updates
- Corned Beef Cooking - 5 Updates
- Trying weird vegan food. - 3 Updates
- Italian Sandwiches: Chicken Romano - 2 Updates
- creaming sugar/butter - 3 Updates
| Ed Pawlowski <esp@snet.net>: Mar 21 06:59PM -0400 On 3/21/2016 6:35 PM, graham wrote: > The libertarians that I've come across are not much different to Tea > Partyers! > Graham That can be a problem. I agree in principle with them but they usually end up with a wacko running. |
| anomaly <not@he.re>: Mar 21 05:02PM -0600 On 3/21/2016 4:31 PM, sf wrote: > She doesn't know her head from a hole in the ground. > -- sf http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3093520/As-Benghazi-aftermath-smoldered-Hillary-Clinton-couldn-t-remember-dead-ambassador-Libya.html As Benghazi compound smoldered, Hillary Clinton couldn't remember the name of her dead ambassador to Libya Emails released Friday by the State Department show the then-secretary inquired about Chris Stevens' death by asking about 'Chris Smith' Among the nearly 900 pages of Hillary Clinton's emails the U.S. State Department released on Friday is one that indicates she may have been confused, exhausted or careless on the September 2012 night when four Americans died in a Benghazi, Libya terror attack. As U.S. ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three other personnel lay dead and America's diplomatic outpost there lay in smoldering ruins, Clinton asked her three closest aides for advice about how to announce the death of 'Chris Smith.' That name – the wrong one – was the subject line of the email Clinton sent them as night turned to day in Libya and the full extent of the Islamist terror attack was becoming apparent. 'Cheryl told me the Libyans confirmed his death,' Clinton, then the secretary of state, wrote. 'Should we announce tonight or wait until morning?' Cheryl Mills, then Clinton's chief of staff, replied to her and others on the chain – deputy chief of staff Jake Sullivan and agency spokeswoman Victoria Nuland. 'We are awaiting formal confirmation from our team,' she wrote. 'We are drafting a statement while we wait.' A total of eight emails in the chain crisscrossed the Internet. None of Clinton's deputies corrected her or clarified whose death they were discussing. Among the other three American personnel to die in the attack was Sean Smith, a foreign service information management officer. But it was Stevens whose death required confirmation from Libyan authorities. A few 'good Samaritans among the hordes of looters and bystanders,' as a State Department review later described them, took his lifeless body from the Benghazi compound and to a hospital, where he was later pronounced dead from smoke inhalation. Clinton, now a presidential candidate and the Democratic Party's front-runner, is facing new rounds of questions about her job performance before, during and after the attack. http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2016/01/15/video-benghazi-families-react-to-new-film-hillarys-accusations-n2104796 Three family members of the Americans murdered by terrorists in Libya more than three years ago joined Megyn Kelly's Fox News program this week to react to the new Benghazi-themed Michael Bay film, 13 Hours. Tyrone Woods' father, Charles, told Kelly that he "really wasn't ready" for the "powerful" and "very emotional" response the movie elicited. Pat Smith, mother of Sean Smith, was in tears throughout the segment. She said she had to walk out of the screening when her son's character appeared on screen. "I couldn't handle it," she explained. Later, she becomes incensed when Kelly asks her about presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's strong implication that Smith and other Benghazi families are the ones who are lying about what she told them at the casket ceremony on September 14, 2012: After this clip cuts off, Mr. Woods says he doesn't want to dishonor his son's memory by politicizing his death, instead opting to produce the diary entry he wrote that day. It was very clear: Clinton blamed the irrelevant internet video for the attack, an explanation she knew for a fact was false at that time. Woods simply reads the note he jotted down and invites viewers to draw their own conclusions. His diary account has been affirmed by three other relatives who were present at the meeting. Extremely compelling. Who's lying? The habitual liar running for political office and who is rightfully distrusted by a large majority of voters, or these grieving people? Meanwhile, as the Benghazi committee continues its work poring over recently-released emails and questioning witnesses (some of whom hadn't been interviewed previously). Politico writes that 13 Hours could create a problem for Republicans because the so-called 'stand-down order' in the film is given by an in-country CIA officer, not an Obama administration official in Washington. The movie is based on the eyewitness testimony of men and women who lived through the horrific ordeal. Politico wonders, will GOP members call this element of their story a lie? A Republican source on the Hill is perplexed by this framing, passing along quotes from committee Democrats who are more directly questioning these witnesses' veracity. They insist that all evidence indicates there was never any stand-down order -- although I'm not sure how they'd explain this email, among other things: #Benghazi Cmte Dems (Hillary endorsers) say special forces on the ground in Libya are wrong about stand down order: pic.twitter.com/KKiC3MT47E — Guy Benson (@guypbenson) January 15, 2016 Oh by the way, what do all three of those Democrats have in common? They've all endorsed, or been endorsed by, the same presidential candidate. As for the 'stand down' order controversy, Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy says, "There are witnesses who say there was [a stand down order], there are witnesses who say there was not one. And I wasn't there. And you weren't there, and your listeners weren't there. So the best I can do is lay out what the witnesses say, and then you're going to have to make a determination as to who you believe is more credible." |
| Bruce <Bruce@Bruce.invalid>: Mar 22 10:19AM +1100 On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:41:20 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe >Oh!! HERE'S where all the new replies to this thread are!! >I may have to buy the latest version of Agent newsreader!! GoogleGroups is really starting to suck for me! Why didn't you want to re-download the free Agent again? -- Bruce |
| anomaly <not@he.re>: Mar 21 05:42PM -0600 On 3/21/2016 5:19 PM, Bruce wrote: >> Oh!! HERE'S where all the new replies to this thread are!! >> I may have to buy the latest version of Agent newsreader!! GoogleGroups is really starting to suck for me! > Why didn't you want to re-download the free Agent again? Why are you also so DAMNED STUPID??? |
| sf <sf@geemail.com>: Mar 21 04:44PM -0700 > Older women vote for Clinton. Younger women vote for Sanders. Younger > women don't have the hangups of the older ones. The truth is older women don't want to F around anymore stroking fragile male egos and want to see things done correctly the first time. -- sf |
| John Kuthe <johnkuthern@gmail.com>: Mar 21 04:59PM -0700 On Monday, March 21, 2016 at 4:57:50 PM UTC-6, anomaly wrote: > On 3/21/2016 4:41 PM, John Kuthe wrote: > > I may have to buy the latest version of Agent newsreader!! GoogleGroups is really starting to suck for me! > Are you so damned STUPID you can't download a FREE reader like Thunderbird? You don't want to get me started about Thunderbird! :-( John Kuthe... |
| Bruce <Bruce@Bruce.invalid>: Mar 22 11:09AM +1100 >The truth is older women don't want to F around anymore stroking >fragile male egos and want to see things done correctly the first >time. This is exactly the hangup I meant. Thanks for proving my point :) -- Bruce |
| "cshenk" <cshenk1@cox.net>: Mar 21 06:12PM -0500 sf wrote in rec.food.cooking: > > The only time I tried wild duck, I didnt like it. I am sure some > > purists will find that odd but i like the domestically raised sorts. > Agree about that, I prefer farmed salmon too. I prefer the idea of sustainable farmed. Salmon however may have issues there? Carol -- |
| Bruce <Bruce@Bruce.invalid>: Mar 22 10:20AM +1100 On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 12:52:54 -1000, dsi1 >People will vote against their interests time after time. Why that is is >a mystery. My best guess is it's because people are stupid and gullible. >I don't believe it to be exclusively an American trait. I don't think so either, but they are very good at it. -- Bruce |
| sf <sf@geemail.com>: Mar 21 04:46PM -0700 > > Agree about that, I prefer farmed salmon too. > I prefer the idea of sustainable farmed. Salmon however may have issues > there? I have certain issues with farmed, but I'd rather improve farming practices than have wild populations over fished to the point of extinction. -- sf |
| lucretiaborgia@fl.it: Mar 21 08:51PM -0300 >I prefer the idea of sustainable farmed. Salmon however may have issues >there? > Carol They rarely raise farm salmon inland, instead they have nets offshore. Salmon frequently escape and are free to spawn with natural born salmon, so don't refer to farmed salmon as 'sustainable' - they can/will likely be the end of wild, natural salmon. |
| dsi1 <dsi1@fishing.net>: Mar 21 02:02PM -1000 On 3/21/2016 1:20 PM, Bruce wrote: >> a mystery. My best guess is it's because people are stupid and gullible. >> I don't believe it to be exclusively an American trait. > I don't think so either, but they are very good at it. We strive for excellence. :) |
| Janet <nobody@home.com>: Mar 21 02:35PM In article <ncokel$bnr$1@dont-email.me>, juliebove@frontier.com says... > > Janet US > When I said, "we", I meant the collective we. I can't remember who it was > but it did happen. you wrote "Not only that but I think we did this before with Tater Tots where she kept insisting that they were croquettes." Your use of "she" clearly referred to Janet B. Janet UK |
| "cshenk" <cshenk1@cox.net>: Mar 21 05:57PM -0500 Julie Bove wrote in rec.food.cooking: > > Janet US > When I said, "we", I meant the collective we. I can't remember who > it was but it did happen. Actually yes, it did. Not sure who was in on it. -- |
| "Julie Bove" <juliebove@frontier.com>: Mar 21 04:49PM -0700 "Janet" <nobody@home.com> wrote in message news:MPG.315a1712a9b9dd73989822@news.individual.net... > Tots where she kept insisting that they were croquettes." > Your use of "she" clearly referred to Janet B. > Janet UK The word was "we", not "she". I know that the subject came up on this group before. |
| "Julie Bove" <juliebove@frontier.com>: Mar 21 04:49PM -0700 "cshenk" <cshenk1@cox.net> wrote in message news:8NmdnVGHN-nG4W3LnZ2dnUU7-RnNnZ2d@giganews.com... >> When I said, "we", I meant the collective we. I can't remember who >> it was but it did happen. > Actually yes, it did. Not sure who was in on it. Thank you. |
| sf <sf@geemail.com>: Mar 21 04:59PM -0700 > > > > thin slices of meat in a sauce. The vegan thing was a cheese > > > > dish and didn't even involve faux meat. But it said the American > > > > equivalent to the word was "scallop". escalope = scaloppa/scallopini > > When I said, "we", I meant the collective we. I can't remember who > > it was but it did happen. > Actually yes, it did. Not sure who was in on it. Who cares? It just goes to show how toxic this group has become that anyone would go after the Janets, the Nancys or even Koko. And it's not hard to understand how the cylindrical shape of a tater tot can be equated to a cylindrical croquette. Of course, this group doesn't cook, they just nit pick and complain all day long as if they're a bunch of cranky retired people. Oh, wait... -- sf |
| "Julie Bove" <juliebove@frontier.com>: Mar 21 03:36PM -0700 "Ophelia" <OphElsinore@gmail.com> wrote in message news:dlase8Ff5u8U1@mid.individual.net... >> The sound isn't very good. Anyway, he starts mock puking before he has >> had time to taste anything :) > I am very pleased to have missed that ... He was making fun of those who make fun of vegans because he was using commonly eaten food. |
| Bruce <Bruce@Bruce.invalid>: Mar 22 09:42AM +1100 On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:36:06 -0700, "Julie Bove" >> I am very pleased to have missed that ... >He was making fun of those who make fun of vegans because he was using >commonly eaten food. Oh, I didn't see enough of it to get that. -- Bruce |
| "Julie Bove" <juliebove@frontier.com>: Mar 21 04:52PM -0700 "Bruce" <Bruce@Bruce.invalid> wrote in message news:v4u0fbttnna1vj20sbjqf1ak1t3ou04gu4@4ax.com... >>He was making fun of those who make fun of vegans because he was using >>commonly eaten food. > Oh, I didn't see enough of it to get that. Yes. Things like Sprite (lemon lime soda), Oreos (cookies), Potato Chips (crisps), bananas and baby carrots. Oh, also some granola bars. He has a lot of other videos but I haven't seen them so don't know the subject. He was also making fun of those people who do videos of themselves eating weird food. |
| "cshenk" <cshenk1@cox.net>: Mar 21 05:36PM -0500 Cheri wrote in rec.food.cooking: > do when you lose a "friend" like that, it hurts like Hell and that's > all there is to it. > Cheri Gary and Cheri, I normally post these in a a pet group but hopefully all will understand. ------- Mia wakens on a soft bed of grass. She stretches out luxuriously and listens to a soft spring wind blowing through a pecan tree off to the side. A lazy bumblebee wanders by and she hides a bit but it wanders off. Listening she hears laughing pets and people. She tucks her nose under her paws because she doesnt hear her special person. Suddenly something pokes her butt! She whips around and finds a kitten with a big grin and a ball of yarn almost as big as she is. She's trying to roll it down to the field but lost in laughter, she's all tangled up. Mia helps roll it down and finds there is a very colorful bridge there, rainbow colored. There are doggies and kitties and even ferrets running about. Mia perks her nose up and bounces the yarn ball down then chases it. The world becomes of flash of sky, earth, sky and earth as she giggles and rides the ball down. Soon she is playing with the other pets and even makes some new friends. Her old buddies are here too! Finally tired, she settles and sees others looking into little water pools. She approaches a pool with her old friends and peers in. They shift over she she can see better. She sees Gary! She misses him so. They explain that they wait here until their 2foots time arrives to take them over the bridge with them. They will go with him as a family. Mia makes a sad and happy sigh, as she knows it's not Gary's time. She will wait for him here, safe and warm. A 2foot who passed before a loved one, cuddles her and lets her know, she is safe. -- |
| sf <sf@geemail.com>: Mar 21 04:38PM -0700 Is bell pepper the difference in recipes between a chicken Romano sandwich and a chicken Milanese sandwich? -- sf |
| sf <sf@geemail.com>: Mar 21 03:42PM -0700 On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:37:25 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton > little gluten. I use King Arthur GP flour, which is > higher in protein than, say, Gold Medal, so I get a > little extra chewiness there, too. Thanks. I think I have KA this time around. Are you saying KA is better for breads than cake? Personally, I'm more the pound cake, old fashioned carrot cake type than Southern style cakes made with cake flour type anyway, so I'm okay with that. I was watching some show on TV where the host went into a bakery and the baker said he used melted butter instead of cutting it in when he makes biscuits and the finished examples were *tall*. Maybe I'll try that method the next time I make biscuits (if I remember). -- sf |
| "itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net" <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Mar 21 04:15PM -0700 On Monday, March 21, 2016 at 12:09:12 PM UTC-5, Gary wrote: > dashboard on hot days. They walk but they also hop. For some reason, > I like them and treat them like car pets. They seem pretty cool. > They never stay long though. I hate them ALL. Those 'cute' little fuzzy spiders don't stay around here long either. I murder them. |
| "itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net" <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Mar 21 04:28PM -0700 On Monday, March 21, 2016 at 1:34:57 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote: > miserly to spend the few pennies on electric. They don't realize how > sunlight ruins fabrics, UV rays bleach the colors and destroys the > fibers. I have a dryer and it is used exclusively in the winter. Sheets are always hung outside Spring through late Fall. Sheets are MUCH easier to fold and put away after line drying. Who cares if UV rays bleach the colors of sheets? I can't say I've seen any destruction of fibers. As I previously stated bras ARE hung out because the damage the dryer does to the elastic. > >We use a dryer. More sanitary than pollen, pine needles and other > >pollution in the air. Only time pollen is a problem around here is in the Spring. No pine trees within a mile. > Not to mention bird poop... birds love clothes lines... first time a > murder of crows poops your freshly laundered clothes you'll never hang > clothes outdoors again. Rarely, rarely do I find bird poop on my sheets. No trees for them to roost in in my yard that is near the clothes line. > Another thing is dryers suck all that pesky > lint off your laundry. Only thing I have trouble with lint is towels. Towels are 'lint givers' and socks and slacks are ;lint takers.' > There's really no point in doing laundry if > you hang it outdoors, could easily end up dirtier than before you > laundered it. Thankfully we can do laundry as we choose. The government has disbanded the "laundry police" agency. > did yoose know that there are special bra > hangers: > http://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=bra+hangers&tag=mh0b-20&index=aps&hvadid=7005461217&hvqmt=e&hvbmt=be&hvdev=c&ref=pd_sl_937vj1783v_e http://www.amazon.com/Laundry-Clothesline-Clothing-Stainless-Clothespins/dp/B00UUSC7YY/ref=sr_1_18?ie=UTF8&qid=1458602788&sr=8-18&keywords=bra+hangers This is the one I have that I use to hang my bras on outside on the clothes line. It would also work very well for socks. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.food.cooking+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment