- My Lady Love is going to make a classic United Statesian food dish! - 1 Update
- The best easy to make quick snack EVER - 4 Updates
- Last nights dinner,,, Shepherds Pie... and a rude surprise - 2 Updates
- Dinner last night .... and oldie revisited - 1 Update
- chicken stock revisited - 1 Update
- For the desert lovers................. - 4 Updates
- please help identify this food - 2 Updates
- I threw out all the Chocolate Covered Cherries! 2 months out! - 6 Updates
- favourite salad dressings - 1 Update
- what do you like to serve with scallops? - 3 Updates
| Bruce <bruce@invalid.invalid>: Mar 01 03:34AM +1100 >So she was excited to cook something for you. >You then completely cut down her meal as the most disgusting.... >Time to find a new lady love, my friend. Aww, Gary's defensive of Campbell's mushroom concoction. "Water, Mushrooms, Vegetable Oil (Corn, Cottonseed, Canola, And/or Soybean), Modified Food Starch, Wheat Flour, Contains Less Than 2% of: Salt, Cream (Milk), Whey, Soy Protein Concentrate, Monosodium Glutamate, Yeast Extract, Flavoring, Garlic." Not so bad, except for the mysterious "Flavoring". Ground up toenails? |
| jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net>: Feb 28 11:09AM -0500 On 2/27/2019 11:40 PM, Julie Bove wrote: > I always thought that I didn't like dry roasted. I had only ever had the > salted ones and they add weird seasonings to those. I recently bought > unsalted ones. Just peanuts. No seasonings. Actually good! I don't mind unsalted dry roasted peanuts at all, even though I like salt. They're tasty! I don't want weirdly seasoned peanuts. Or seasoned seeds (as in sunflower seeds or pumpkin seeds; I snack on those, too). No thanks to Ranch, BBQ or whatever other things they've come up with. Salt only, please. :) Jill |
| "Ophelia" <OphElsnore@gmail.com>: Feb 28 04:19PM "Gary" wrote in message news:5C78042E.ABD3AA82@att.net... jmcquown wrote: > The idea of Nutella > never attracted me because I can't imagine spreading jarred chocolate on > anything. I agree. And the commercials I saw showed "Mom" serving it to her young children for breakfast (Nutella spread on toast) before leaving for school. wow and yikes! == I have never eaten Nutella so I have no idea what it tastes like, but why do you make it sound so poisonous? Surely it is not or it wouldn't be on sale? |
| Bruce <bruce@invalid.invalid>: Mar 01 03:19AM +1100 >> use anything to put them down. >What a total hypocrite you are. WOW > MOM Are you calling for your mother? >sea or the land predators. All are God's creatures, my friend. If >you repect living creatures, you should respect them all, not >pick and choose to suit your needs. You should not preach to me because you shove anything into your mouth that will fit and come out the other side. |
| ChristKiller@deathtochristianity.pl: Feb 28 03:44PM -0600 >Mr. Killer does not use a broad brush, but an extra wide roller. He has >a narrow view of what is going on and does not want to see anymore than >his view. He gets his jollies getting people upset with his remarks. No not true, that is just how you take it because you are offended and/or prejudiced by a name >Its a hobby for him. Yup you are a theist because you are obviously a liar and just make shit up that fits your agenda -- ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____ |
| Bruce <bruce@invalid.invalid>: Mar 01 03:31AM +1100 On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 03:03:26 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton >and >"Worcestershire, ketchup and beef broth" >Beef broth, not beef. That's still beef. |
| Bruce <bruce@invalid.invalid>: Mar 01 03:31AM +1100 On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:08:54 -0500, Dave Smith >> "Worcestershire, ketchup and beef broth" >> Beef broth, not beef. >You have to excuse Bruce. He's Bruce. That is reason enough. That's sweet of you. |
| Bruce <bruce@invalid.invalid>: Mar 01 03:30AM +1100 >Darn place finally opened up here and only about 1.5 miles from >me. I've really wanted to check it out but still haven't gone. >1) I rarely go that direction Did you know that you're in control of which direction you go in? |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Feb 28 11:31AM -0500 > and stuff out for the wild critters and there ended up being a bit of > a rat/racoon etc. problem. technically you can't throw a few nuts at > a squirrel, but that would probably be overlooked. My friend has major problems with the crazy old lady next door. She puts food out for critters. She puts out seed and suet for birds and puts dog and cat food. That stuff can attract all sorts of undesirable animals. Last year he went out and got some live traps and caught dozens of squirrels and chipmunks and relocated them. When she learned that he was trapping the animals she went postal and said she was going to report him to the authorities. |
| jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net>: Feb 28 11:11AM -0500 On 2/28/2019 10:55 AM, Gary wrote: >> I'm not even that weird! > LOL. At the time, I didn't realize it was a typo for "OAT milk" > I visualized milk made from acorns or something. LOL What typo? Dave said "oat milk". No mention of acorns anywhere. Jill |
| Bruce <bruce@invalid.invalid>: Mar 01 03:27AM +1100 On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 08:28:50 -0500, jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote: >>> I'll be back.... >> It's a Canadian thing. Maple syrup, Pine Nuts, Oak milk... >Maple syrup, yes. Pine nuts (pinolis), not really a Canadian thing. :) Baby seal meat? (Do Canadians still club baby seals to death?) |
| Bruce <bruce@invalid.invalid>: Mar 01 03:27AM +1100 >> I'm not even that weird! >LOL. At the time, I didn't realize it was a typo for "OAT milk" >I visualized milk made from acorns or something. LOL There's acorn coffee. |
| Bruce <bruce@invalid.invalid>: Mar 01 03:28AM +1100 On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:11:52 -0500, jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote: >> LOL. At the time, I didn't realize it was a typo for "OAT milk" >> I visualized milk made from acorns or something. LOL >What typo? Dave said "oat milk". No mention of acorns anywhere. Reread the above and use your finger until you reach the K. |
| dsi1 <dsi123@hawaiiantel.net>: Feb 28 01:37PM -0800 On Thursday, February 28, 2019 at 11:08:09 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote: > I hope you're not putting down food for the common people. Gary no > like that! Besides, you'd love to have some around when that famine > hits! Looks like your hope is a valid one. I've had turkey bacon. It's mostly a highly engineered designer food. In the future most foods will be of this nature. You cannot compare it to bacon because it's not. As we all know, I'm not fooled by surface appearances. Rather, it is a meat jerky of some sort that would be great when travelling. |
| ChristKiller@deathtochristianity.pl: Feb 28 03:40PM -0600 On Fri, 01 Mar 2019 08:08:05 +1100, Bruce <bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>They shouldn't sell that stuff as any kind of bacon. It's much better to just call it what it is - chopped and formed turkey semi-meatlike substance strips. >But would "chopped and formed turkey semi-meatlike substance strips" >work well in a commercial? I already said that I think it is turkey bacon, because it has visible fat on it but it looks exactly like the turkey bacon I see in the store all the time -- ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____ |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Feb 28 11:19AM -0500 On 2019-02-28 6:31 a.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote: > that "Women's Studies" isn't a viable career option. > That said, I feel that the U.S. does a terrible job of providing a > suitable education for the non-college-bound. Women's Studies and Native Studies seem to be quite popular these days. There are lots of government jobs that seem to attract their graduates. I wonder if it has a lot to do with the politics and empire building that are endemic to universities these days. Things like that used to be part of the History or Sociology departments. Each department has a chair, and the chair gets all sorts of bonuses, a bigger office, more perks, higher salary, more prestige. I studied physiological psychology and comparative animal behaviour, and my degree is in Psychology. Who knows what it would be if graduated in 2019 instead of 1974. |
| Ed Pawlowski <esp@snet.xxx>: Feb 28 11:19AM -0500 On 2/28/2019 9:52 AM, graham wrote: > and responsibility for themselves. Not everyone can get a well-paying, > salaried job with comprehensive benefits and the wherewithal to invest > in the future. In fact, a very large proportion of the population can't! Many years ago, you needed no special education, just a little ability to do a good job at the factory. In one instance, I started in the office at one of those factories right out of high school. It was minimum wage, but it was also a path to other jobs in other departments. I left there as a supervisor over 45 workers. Typical of factories, the workers made enough money to buy a modest house, drive a modest car, eat well, keep their families fed, clothed and schooled. In 1970 that company moved south to save money. The number of jobs like that began to dwindle. The world has changed, be it good or bad, adapt. |
| Bruce <bruce@invalid.invalid>: Mar 01 03:21AM +1100 >oh dear lord. That claim is even more arrogant and much worse >than the typical, "I've worked hard all my life." >You just lost face here big time, at least imo. >:-o That's alright. I have many faces. I can afford to lose one. But it's true. I work hard. Nothing to brag about, on the contrary maybe, just a fact. |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Feb 28 11:24AM -0500 On 2019-02-28 6:39 a.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote: > Who paid for the first generation of Social Security recipients? The > people who were working at the time. It's been that way ever since. > Same with Medicare. It's like a big Ponzi scheme. It starts up with one generation. They pay into a pension fund as they work and they have a bunch of kids. The kids start working and contributing. The first generation retires and starts collecting and their kids' generation is paying for it. Then a third generation comes along and there are even more paying. But then we started having smaller families. Manufacturing starts going overseas where the jobs pay less and they don't have pensions. Some of the jobs are being done by robots, and they are contributing or paying any taxes. |
| Bruce <bruce@invalid.invalid>: Mar 01 03:24AM +1100 >and responsibility for themselves. Not everyone can get a well-paying, >salaried job with comprehensive benefits and the wherewithal to invest >in the future. In fact, a very large proportion of the population can't! They can go live in a ghetto and resort to crime and drugs, because they have nothing to lose anyway. And then we spend a lot of money on a police force to control them and fight the drugs. The Republican Solution. |
| Bruce <bruce@invalid.invalid>: Mar 01 03:26AM +1100 On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 03:39:42 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton >Who paid for the first generation of Social Security recipients? The >people who were working at the time. It's been that way ever since. >Same with Medicare. Everybody's selfish, but if too many people are too selfish, you get a disfunctional country. |
| ChristKiller@deathtochristianity.pl: Feb 28 03:38PM -0600 On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 08:05:40 -0800 (PST), parkstreetbooboo@gmail.com wrote: I have made several different dressing, The one I will list is the best ever. Yes It is thousand Island, and everyone is like oh great another thousand island, just another Russian dressing that has been the same forever. This thousand island will NOT taste like any thousand island you have ever tried before, there are a few subtle differences that make the world of difference. I guess if I wanted I can call it two thousand island. The recipe ingredients must be followed exactly I would stick with gluten free ingredients, gluten can change the taste. Thousand Island dressing INGREDIENTS 1/2 cup mayonnaise (gluten free) 2 tablespoons ketchup(gluten free) 1 tablespoon rice wine vinegar(gluten free) 2 teaspoons sugar(gluten free) diced bread and butter chips to taste(the more the better)(gluten free) finely diced onions to taste(the more the better)(gluten free) 1/8 teaspoon salt(gluten free) 1 dash black pepper(gluten free) If you want to know what gluten free brands I use just ask DIRECTIONS Combine all of the ingredients in a small bowl. Stir well. I have found it is easier to put in a sealable container, and shake the hell out of it. Some say it is usually best to let the dressing sit for about 20 minutes to allow flavors to meld, but I use it right away and it is spectacular I have made up to a 4x recipe using 4x all ingredients and it has come out just as good... and I had eaten all of it within a weeek -- ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____ |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Feb 28 11:11AM -0500 On 2019-02-28 6:13 a.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote: >> well. Though I like some tropical type fish once in a while, cold >> water is superior, in my opinion. > I'm with you. Especially oysters, which I only eat raw. Even fresh water fish is better from cold water. There used to be a trout farm near here. They tasted a little muddy in the summer but in the winter they were much better. |
| "Ophelia" <OphElsnore@gmail.com>: Feb 28 04:09PM "Gary" wrote in message news:5C77FCF9.64AF09FE@att.net... Cindy Hamilton wrote: > Yep. I'm just a wild risk-taker. Next I'll take up sky diving. I plan to do sky diving myself just as soon as my doctor says I only have a few months left to live. Go out with a bang. :) == My husband did a lot of that in the military. He hated every single jump and wouldn't do it now if you paid him lol |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Feb 28 11:26AM -0500 > liquid is frozen and weighed with the scallops. I'm not interested > unless they are fresh but then again, I suppose mid-continent others > may not have a choice. What about off season? |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.food.cooking+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment