- Cooking frozen meatloaf without thawing??? - 7 Updates
- Tiles back on! - 8 Updates
- The quality of the writing on this NG is so much better than on Facebook - 6 Updates
- Mixing oils - 1 Update
- OT: Does Sirius Radio Pay Their Hosts?? - 1 Update
- Know why women's pants don't have pockets? - 2 Updates
| Thomas <canope234@gmail.com>: Jul 16 12:56PM -0700 On Thursday, February 1, 2007 at 1:25:14 PM UTC-5, tert in seattle wrote: > >this thread it's obvious that many lick each other's butts. > not bad > B+ Freaking awesome. Tert nailin it 13 years ago. Lol. |
| Bruce <bruce@null.null>: Jul 17 06:02AM +1000 On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:42:14 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 >> > meatloafs? They're all made and frozen raw. >> This is a super-old thread but we just enjoyed a delicious meatloaf baked from raw frozen and unthawed. Plenty of Onions in it. We baked it for an hour and a half on 350- (I'd only bake a thawed meatloaf for an hour) then, after we made sure that the internal temp reached 155 - we ate it! Yum! Nothing wrong with that meatloaf! There are only 3 of us here. After 2 days, it was gone. >An air fryer works wonderfully for meatloaf. All the fat drains off. That's a good thing. OTOH, this means that you can only make small ones that don't require a pan. It works swell for me. I thought fat was flavour for all y'all meat eaters. |
| Cindy Hamilton <angelicapaganelli@yahoo.com>: Jul 16 01:17PM -0700 On Thursday, July 16, 2020 at 4:02:58 PM UTC-4, Bruce wrote: > >> This is a super-old thread but we just enjoyed a delicious meatloaf baked from raw frozen and unthawed. Plenty of Onions in it. We baked it for an hour and a half on 350- (I'd only bake a thawed meatloaf for an hour) then, after we made sure that the internal temp reached 155 - we ate it! Yum! Nothing wrong with that meatloaf! There are only 3 of us here. After 2 days, it was gone. > >An air fryer works wonderfully for meatloaf. All the fat drains off. That's a good thing. OTOH, this means that you can only make small ones that don't require a pan. It works swell for me. > I thought fat was flavour for all y'all meat eaters. Up to a point, yes. After that, it's just fat. Would you eat an entire kilo of butter all at once? Or even 1/4 of that? Cindy Hamilton |
| dsi1 <dsi123@hawaiiantel.net>: Jul 16 01:18PM -0700 On Thursday, July 16, 2020 at 10:02:58 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote: > >> This is a super-old thread but we just enjoyed a delicious meatloaf baked from raw frozen and unthawed. Plenty of Onions in it. We baked it for an hour and a half on 350- (I'd only bake a thawed meatloaf for an hour) then, after we made sure that the internal temp reached 155 - we ate it! Yum! Nothing wrong with that meatloaf! There are only 3 of us here. After 2 days, it was gone. > >An air fryer works wonderfully for meatloaf. All the fat drains off. That's a good thing. OTOH, this means that you can only make small ones that don't require a pan. It works swell for me. > I thought fat was flavour for all y'all meat eaters. My guess is that you know nothing about meatloaf. Let's keep it that way. |
| Bruce <bruce@null.null>: Jul 17 06:19AM +1000 On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 13:17:56 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton >> I thought fat was flavour for all y'all meat eaters. >Up to a point, yes. After that, it's just fat. >Would you eat an entire kilo of butter all at once? Or even 1/4 of that? No. |
| Sheldon Martin <penmart01@aol.com>: Jul 16 04:53PM -0400 On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 13:18:08 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 >> >An air fryer works wonderfully for meatloaf. All the fat drains off. That's a good thing. OTOH, this means that you can only make small ones that don't require a pan. It works swell for me. >> I thought fat was flavour for all y'all meat eaters. >My guess is that you know nothing about meatloaf. Let's keep it that way. If you knew anything you'd know that meat loaf is two words... check a dictionary, of course yoose ukeleles don't know how. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/meat%20loaf |
| Hank Rogers <Nospam@invalid.com>: Jul 16 03:54PM -0500 Bruce wrote: >>> This is a super-old thread but we just enjoyed a delicious meatloaf baked from raw frozen and unthawed. Plenty of Onions in it. We baked it for an hour and a half on 350- (I'd only bake a thawed meatloaf for an hour) then, after we made sure that the internal temp reached 155 - we ate it! Yum! Nothing wrong with that meatloaf! There are only 3 of us here. After 2 days, it was gone. >> An air fryer works wonderfully for meatloaf. All the fat drains off. That's a good thing. OTOH, this means that you can only make small ones that don't require a pan. It works swell for me. > I thought fat was flavour for all y'all meat eaters. It also makes for excellent aromas for all yoose butt sniffers! |
| Hank Rogers <Nospam@invalid.com>: Jul 16 03:09PM -0500 John Kuthe wrote: >> What perecent is new tile? > Some. They intermixed the old and new in a very regular planned pattern. By hand! > John Kuthe, Climate Anarchist, Suburban Renewalist and very well fed Vegetarian Like a patchwork quilt? |
| Jeßus <j@j.net>: Jul 17 06:30AM +1000 On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 10:02:24 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe >https://i.postimg.cc/fbbd5ZGx/Tiles-back-on-7-16-2020-2.jpg >https://i.postimg.cc/dt8GV5RT/Tiles-back-on-7-16-2020-1.jpg >Courtesy of Old World Roofing, doing in the Right Way! :-) I still can't believe how much this is costing you, it's not even a large house. |
| jay <jay@mail.com>: Jul 16 02:33PM -0600 On 7/16/20 1:04 PM, John Kuthe wrote: >> What perecent is new tile? > Some. They intermixed the old and new in a very regular planned pattern. By hand! > John Kuthe, Climate Anarchist, Suburban Renewalist and very well fed Vegetarian Did they put bird stop on the first tile row to keep rats and birds from nesting there? Don't see it in the photos. |
| John Kuthe <johnkuthern@gmail.com>: Jul 16 01:35PM -0700 On Thursday, July 16, 2020 at 3:09:35 PM UTC-5, Hank Rogers wrote: > > Some. They intermixed the old and new in a very regular planned pattern. By hand! > > John Kuthe, Climate Anarchist, Suburban Renewalist and very well fed Vegetarian > Like a patchwork quilt? A regular planned patchwork of old and new, just slightly. After the final acid wash will be the big reveal! :-) John Kuthe... |
| John Kuthe <johnkuthern@gmail.com>: Jul 16 01:38PM -0700 On Thursday, July 16, 2020 at 3:30:56 PM UTC-5, Jeßus wrote: > >Courtesy of Old World Roofing, doing in the Right Way! :-) > I still can't believe how much this is costing you, it's not even a > large house. Me too, but I know quality work when I see it. No not large, only 1500 sqft and now it will have a renewed red clay tile roof, which is a 100 year roof. House was completed in 1930, so just shy of 100 years on the old one. John Kuthe... |
| jay <jay@mail.com>: Jul 16 02:42PM -0600 On 7/16/20 2:30 PM, Je�us wrote: >> Courtesy of Old World Roofing, doing in the Right Way! :-) > I still can't believe how much this is costing you, it's not even a > large house. Yes it's a 100K+ courtesy .. a moving fee. Moving the tile out of the way refelting and moving it back. They will use very few new tiles. |
| jay <jay@mail.com>: Jul 16 02:45PM -0600 On 7/16/20 2:38 PM, John Kuthe wrote: >> large house. > Me too, but I know quality work when I see it. No not large, only 1500 sqft and now it will have a renewed red clay tile roof, which is a 100 year roof. House was completed in 1930, so just shy of 100 years on the old one. > John Kuthe... Total bullshit. It is not a 100 year roof. The tile is may last a hundred years the felt will not. The felt is what keeps the water out not the tile. |
| jay <jay@mail.com>: Jul 16 02:49PM -0600 On 7/16/20 2:38 PM, John Kuthe wrote: >> I still can't believe how much this is costing you, it's not even a >> large house. > Me too, but I know quality work when I see it. And you no nothing about roofing or quality work or anything else for that matter. ahahahaha |
| bruce2bowser@gmail.com: Jul 16 01:01PM -0700 On Wednesday, July 15, 2020 at 7:37PM, Bryan Simmons wrote: > Remember, "Who am I? Why am I here?" I revisited this NG after getting a 7 day ban from FB for insulting a dumbass. With all the faults of many folks who post here, the quality of writing on this NG doesn't grate on me. There are no stupid GIFs, nor rampant misspellings of homophones, and it's not just that we skew older, because the half brain dead oldsters on the nostalgia FB pages are as bad as the stupid, cutesy, twenty-something children. > --Bryan Hell, I didn't even know that there was writing on Faceboo |
| Hank Rogers <Nospam@invalid.com>: Jul 16 03:07PM -0500 Ed Pawlowski wrote: >> John Kuthe... > So is Thunderbird and Eternal-September. For $5 you can get enough > from Blocknews for a couple of years use. But are you sure they are not evil surveillance capitalists? |
| dsi1 <dsi123@hawaiiantel.net>: Jul 16 01:12PM -0700 On Thursday, July 16, 2020 at 9:06:25 AM UTC-10, Cindy Hamilton wrote: > > You can also do a search directly from the interface. The Usenet servers have a limited retention policy - Google Groups goes back to the 90's. In the future, everybody's going to be using GG - they just don't know it yet. > I imagine that will be after Google has eaten all the other Usenet providers. > Cindy Hamilton You could set up a Linux client but you haven't. So could I but I won't. |
| dsi1 <dsi123@hawaiiantel.net>: Jul 16 01:14PM -0700 On Thursday, July 16, 2020 at 9:13:13 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote: > > Google Groups has some serious advantages. > It's been rumored that Google will drop GG. They've > already fubar'd the archives. That rumor could be true. It seems reasonable to me. OTOH, they've come up with a new interface for Google Groups so they're not completely ignoring it - not like that you-know-what-legacy-client-program. |
| dsi1 <dsi123@hawaiiantel.net>: Jul 16 01:15PM -0700 On Thursday, July 16, 2020 at 9:38:05 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote: > >Google Groups has some serious advantages. It's faster, you can use it on any platform that supports a browser, and you don't need Windows at all. It's also easier to read because it hides quoting - you don't see it until you click on the placeholder link. You can also do a search directly from the interface. The Usenet servers have a limited retention policy - Google Groups goes back to the 90's. In the future, everybody's going to be using GG - they just don't know it yet. > We don't have to repeat this discussion again. John hates Google, so > why use it? Excellent point! |
| Cindy Hamilton <angelicapaganelli@yahoo.com>: Jul 16 01:32PM -0700 On Thursday, July 16, 2020 at 4:15:03 PM UTC-4, dsi1 wrote: > > It's been rumored that Google will drop GG. They've > > already fubar'd the archives. > That rumor could be true. It seems reasonable to me. OTOH, they've come up with a new interface for Google Groups so they're not completely ignoring it - not like that you-know-what-legacy-client-program. Do you mean: rn ? <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rn_(newsreader)?wprov=srpw1_18> Cindy Hamilton |
| Jeßus <j@j.net>: Jul 17 06:32AM +1000 On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 05:45:43 -0700, Taxed and Spent >> Could I mix some solid cooking oil with rice bran oil to make it >> solidify a bit when cool (to store without splashing) >Why do you splash? Parkinson's? |
| jgrove24@hotmail.com: Jul 16 01:25PM -0700 A huge part of the Stephanie Miller show is groveling for premium content subscriptions and online "show" tickets. How expensive is pool and garden maintenance in Hollywood? A downward spiral into Brin Hartman is evident with the shooting of darts at staff. |
| dsi1 <dsi123@hawaiiantel.net>: Jul 16 01:22PM -0700 On Thursday, July 16, 2020 at 8:47:24 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote: > Can't disagree with that. I don't know why so many of them carry their > cell phones in their butt pockets, but they do. It's a wonder that more > of them don't break. I suppose that's not a bad thing. Putting your phone back there forces you to sit up straight. I tend to slip down in my chair - perhaps I should try keeping my phone there. |
| dsi1 <dsi123@hawaiiantel.net>: Jul 16 01:22PM -0700 On Thursday, July 16, 2020 at 8:52:56 AM UTC-10, Thomas wrote: > The phone says look at my pretty ass. Take notice which asses do not have phones. And it works too! |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.food.cooking+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment