- Omicron - 11 Updates
- Lemme get this straight. - 9 Updates
- World War II advice on how to conserve food: - 4 Updates
- Sunday Brunch - 1 Update
| Lucretia Borgia <lucretiaborgia@fl.it>: Jan 10 03:17PM -0400 On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 05:00:48 +1100, Dave Smith >>through playing bridge is blind in one eye, same reason. >Did they get that as a child or because the mother got measles during >pregnancy? My daughter had measles when she was about 8 and it was only afterwards when I thought she was being insolent that I realised something was awry. The way the woman at bridge told me, I took it she meant she also had it school aged like my daughter. |
| Lucretia Borgia <lucretiaborgia@fl.it>: Jan 10 03:19PM -0400 On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:50:19 -0500, Michael Trew >As I was taught, God as an entity would rather not intervene, and allow >his creation to live out their lives; hence the initial "falling of >man", see: Garden of Eden story. But the Garden of Eden was a fable anyway! |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 11 06:23AM +1100 On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:17:09 -0400, Lucretia Borgia >afterwards when I thought she was being insolent that I realised >something was awry. The way the woman at bridge told me, I took it >she meant she also had it school aged like my daughter. I didn't know this was possible. I only knew about the danger during pregnancy. -- This is NOT a post by Dave Smith |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 11 06:24AM +1100 On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:19:14 -0400, Lucretia Borgia >>On 1/10/2022 12:34, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>> I was given to understand that God made the first two receptacles. >>> Seems like He could make more at any time. We're all the result of inbreeding. >>his creation to live out their lives; hence the initial "falling of >>man", see: Garden of Eden story. >But the Garden of Eden was a fable anyway! Maybe not to Michael. -- This is NOT a post by Dave Smith |
| Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca>: Jan 10 12:28PM -0700 On 2022-01-10 12:23 p.m., Dave Smith wrote: >> she meant she also had it school aged like my daughter. > I didn't know this was possible. I only knew about the danger during > pregnancy. The big danger during pregnancy is German Measles/Rubella. Suffered during the first trimester, the baby will be born a spastic. You don't see many cases of that, if any, these days. |
| Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Jan 10 02:30PM -0500 On 1/10/2022 14:19, Lucretia Borgia wrote: >> his creation to live out their lives; hence the initial "falling of >> man", see: Garden of Eden story. > But the Garden of Eden was a fable anyway! For your sake, when you pass away, I hope that you are correct. I would bet that more people become "born again Christians" on their death beds, than people from any other walks of life. OTOH, we can all believe what we want to, as that's the beauty of having free will and choice. It works out very nicely when people don't judge other people for their beliefs. |
| Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca>: Jan 10 12:33PM -0700 On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:30:13 -0500, Michael Trew wrote: > For your sake, when you pass away, I hope that you are correct. I would > bet that more people become "born again Christians" on their death beds, > than people from any other walks of life. A myth! > OTOH, we can all believe what we want to, as that's the beauty of having > free will and choice. It works out very nicely when people don't judge > other people for their beliefs. What? Some of the beliefs are so stupid, even dangerous, that it's only right to judge them! |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 11 06:42AM +1100 On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:30:13 -0500, Michael Trew >For your sake, when you pass away, I hope that you are correct. I would >bet that more people become "born again Christians" on their death beds, >than people from any other walks of life. Uhm, can't you be a Christian without taking everything, including the Garden of Eden, literally, as if you were a child? -- This is NOT a post by Dave Smith |
| Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Jan 10 02:43PM -0500 On 1/10/2022 14:33, Graham wrote: >> bet that more people become "born again Christians" on their death beds, >> than people from any other walks of life. > A myth! Read my post again. I *didn't* say "most people become Christians on their death beds". I *did* say, that, I bet that more people become Christians on their death bed -- terrified of what might come next... as opposed to, say, an average healthy person who didn't grow up with faith (or did, but changed his/her mind or fell away from it years later). >> other people for their beliefs. > What? Some of the beliefs are so stupid, even dangerous, that it's only > right to judge them! Unless it has a huge affect on yours or others livelihoods, such as a cult following (drink the kool-aid), that seems like an over-reaction. |
| Sheldon Martin <penmart01@aol.com>: Jan 10 02:43PM -0500 On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 04:56:50 +1100, Dave Smith >Just plain litres? Or special American litres, which equate to .79 >real litres aka 14.7 fl.ozzes if you measure volume or 17.34 litres if >you measure weight, further depending on the state? The plastic bottle is embossed 1.75 LITER... nothing about litres or ozzes. And I goofed, the discount for buying a case is 20%, not 15%. I paid $82.87... I perused the Visa reciept so by buying the case I saved $15.99... so amounts to getting one bottle free. This morning it was 14ºF, I got a special treat, one of the brother's daughter carried the case to my car, she looked about 20, she was wearing a very nice down ski jacket, but still with those skin tight knit pants I could see she had an ass to die for. Too bad I'm not 50 years younger, and fortunately I can't get convicted for looking and dreaming. |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 10 12:43PM -0700 On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 06:23:22 +1100, Dave Smith >>she meant she also had it school aged like my daughter. >I didn't know this was possible. I only knew about the danger during >pregnancy. Uhm, Dit is mijn kikker. Ghe Ghe Ghe. -- This is NOT a post by Dave Smith |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 10 02:16PM -0500 On 2022-01-10 1:30 p.m., Michael Trew wrote: > continues to respond to me. He ought to take the hint and just ignore > me like Jebus did. I'm certainly not offended, if it works out for both > parties. Of course she replies to you. She is thrilled to see that she got some attention when everyone else is ignoring her. |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 10 02:24PM -0500 On 2022-01-10 1:34 p.m., Michael Trew wrote: > frogger's fault, a response which I won't see. In anticipation of that, > I'll now state that he is *JUST AS BAD* as the forgers for attempting to > soil Dave Smith's name *JUST* out of spite. She has a special hard on for me because was probably the first one to filter her and pointed out her nymshifting to get past the filters. Rather than learn how to behave like an adult so that people would take him seriously he got vindictive and made more enemies. The last time he pulled this crap he was the one came out smelling like crap. He still has the opportunity to slink away and perhaps reinventing himself as a decent human being. Until then, the poor dumb bastard has to keep on forging the person he hates in order for anyone to see his posts. |
| Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Jan 10 02:25PM -0500 On 1/10/2022 14:16, Dave Smith wrote: >> both parties. > Of course she replies to you. She is thrilled to see that she got some > attention when everyone else is ignoring her. I only see the Bruce replies when other people decided to quote them, so I'm not sure what you are talking about. I do have to glance at them so I know which to delete and which are your posts, since I go out of my way to make sure that I still see the actual Dave Smith posts. |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 10 02:27PM -0500 On 2022-01-10 1:35 p.m., Michael Trew wrote: >> attention he craves. > The funny part is, that people are still responding to your posts, and > deleting his. He doesn't realize how miserably he has failed, LOL. Yes indeed. It would appear that almost all his posts are being ignored while people are still reading and replying to mine. That probably really pisses her off. |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 11 06:36AM +1100 On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:24:49 -0500, Dave Smith >She has a special hard on for me There's a bit of gender confusion going on there, Dave. That's very modern of you! > because was probably the first one to >filter her and pointed out her nymshifting to get past the filters. I don't know if that's true, but I don't mind playing along. Ladies and gentlemen, Dave "Pickleball" Smith was the first to filter me and point out my nymshifting. Let's hear if for Pickleball! >He still has the opportunity to slink away and perhaps reinventing >himself as a decent human being. Until then, the poor dumb bastard has >to keep on forging the person he hates in order for anyone to see his posts. I don't hate you. I may not be your biggest fan, but I don't hate you :) -- This is NOT a post by Dave Smith |
| Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Jan 10 02:37PM -0500 On 1/10/2022 14:24, Dave Smith wrote: > himself as a decent human being. Until then, the poor dumb bastard has > to keep on forging the person he hates in order for anyone to see his > posts. I don't like to ignore people, so I hope that he considers your last paragraph. I can't fathom being somewhere and being particularly disliked by the majority of the people, yet continuing to dig my hole deeper. Unless a person is just vindictive, your average person probably would feel the same way. I would bet that most people would give him another shot if he disappeared for a couple of months and came back with a less crappy attitude. |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 11 06:37AM +1100 On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:25:50 -0500, Michael Trew >I'm not sure what you are talking about. I do have to glance at them so >I know which to delete and which are your posts, since I go out of my >way to make sure that I still see the actual Dave Smith posts. We know, Michael, we know. You don't have to say it 10 times. Get over me. Lovely little suck-up, by the way :) -- This is NOT a post by Dave Smith |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 10 12:42PM -0700 On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 06:37:35 +1100, Dave Smith >We know, Michael, we know. You don't have to say it 10 times. Get over >me. >Lovely little suck-up, by the way :) Uhm, Dit is mijn kikker. Ghe Ghe Ghe. -- This is NOT a post by Dave Smith |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 10 12:42PM -0700 On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 06:36:24 +1100, Dave Smith >>to keep on forging the person he hates in order for anyone to see his posts. >I don't hate you. I may not be your biggest fan, but I don't hate you >:) Uhm, Dit is mijn kikker. Ghe Ghe Ghe. -- This is NOT a post by Dave Smith |
| Cindy Hamilton <angelicapaganelli@yahoo.com>: Jan 10 11:27AM -0800 On Monday, January 10, 2022 at 1:41:04 PM UTC-5, Michael Trew wrote: > > still a fair amount of shelf dedicated to it in the grocery stores. > Ah, I wasn't counting oatmeal. I suppose that's the modern version of > hot cereal. Why wouldn't you count oatmeal? People have been eating oatmeal porridge for centuries. What would you consider hot cereal to be? Cindy Hamilton |
| Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca>: Jan 10 12:30PM -0700 On 2022-01-10 12:27 p.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote: > porridge for centuries. > What would you consider hot cereal to be? > Cindy Hamilton Cornflakes with hot milk! That's the way I had it as a child:-) |
| Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Jan 10 02:34PM -0500 On 1/10/2022 14:27, Cindy Hamilton wrote: > porridge for centuries. > What would you consider hot cereal to be? > Cindy Hamilton I typically think of traditional porridge, cream of wheat, "malt-o-meal", etc. I'm probably getting hung up on terminology more than anything. I didn't think of oatmeal when I made my initial post. Either way, it seems that most people who eat oatmeal today make single servings, and not family size servings in a large pot. I'm saying that it's less likely to have left over "hot cereal" today, than in years prior (read: the link mentioning uses for left over hot cereal). |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 10 02:42PM -0500 On 2022-01-10 2:27 p.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote: > Why wouldn't you count oatmeal? People have been eating oatmeal > porridge for centuries. > What would you consider hot cereal to be? I have to admit he had me wondering if he didn't think of oatmeal as a hot cereal. Porridge and hot cereal are one and the same. |
| Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid>: Jan 10 01:36PM -0600 Sheldon Martin wrote: > breakfast, I do brunch at about 10 AM, usually toasted raison bread > w/butter. I'm retired but I'm still out of bed at 5:30 AM, cats know > time. Yoose wouldn't like Mary B's biscuits Popeye. The "B" is her cup size. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.food.cooking+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment