Monday, February 21, 2022

Digest for rec.food.cooking@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 12 topics

Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Feb 21 05:02PM -0500

On 2/21/2022 13:43, Tummynums wrote:
 
> https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51895442374_3e3834c5d6_m.jpg20222102
> by [url=https://www.flickr.com/photos/195130871@N08/]Tummynums[/url],
> on Flickr
 
Interesting request. Here's my avocado green Fire King mug that I
usually drink coffee out of at home.
 
https://postimg.cc/YGc2gyFJ
 
I was using a Home Laughlin hotel-ware mug prior to this, but I dropped
it and broke the handle off.
Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid>: Feb 21 04:02PM -0600

cshenk wrote:
> With 7 monitors, 3 computers, 3 lamps and a printer plus a radio/record
> player back here, I stress some limits. The saving grace is added an
> outlet (own circuit) several years ago. Now I want 6 instead of 5.
 
You must be using vacuum tube monitors and maybe incandescent bulbs
in the three lamps?
jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net>: Feb 21 04:36PM -0500

On 2/21/2022 4:19 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> Finally got the backspash installed today.
 
> https://postimg.cc/QFM7pz5N
 
That's a nice looking backsplash, Ed. :)
 
Jill
Sumbax <Sumbax@nomail.invalid>: Feb 22 08:56AM +1100

On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 16:36:32 -0500, jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net>
wrote:
 
>> Finally got the backspash installed today.
 
>> https://postimg.cc/QFM7pz5N
 
>That's a nice looking backsplash, Ed. :)
 
Trippy!
Sumbax@nomail.invalid: Feb 21 04:29PM -0500

On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:28:46 +1100, Sumbax <Sumbax@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
 
>ago or so they put new effort into it and that made it worse. Google
>Groups now removed empty lines, turning every thread into an
>uninviting block of text. T-shirt: Do it well or don't bother.
We Dutch have a saying about froggers like yoos, which is KILL
YOURSELF you loser. no friends no real job no money no sex and no hope
for the future. Loser. Ghe Ghe Ghe.
Sumbax@nomail.invalid: Feb 21 04:30PM -0500

>they wouldnt mess with when they bought it out. Now it's almost
>useless. Then they came up with the garbage known as 'google groups'
>They couldnt even call it Usenet.
Ghe?? Uhm, I dont ghet it?!?
Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid>: Feb 21 03:58PM -0600

jmcquown wrote:
> should never have tried to get into Usenet access.  Google is a
> joke when it comes to posting to Usenet.  Always has been.
 
> Jill
 
Is google as bad as aioe?
Jeßus <j@j.net>: Feb 22 08:01AM +1100

On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:02:38 -0500, jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net>
wrote:
 
 
>> Oh, OK. Thanks.
 
>The government doesn't pay alimony to ex-spouses. You're listening to
>Joan's forger again. :(
 
Sigh. OK, can anyone point out her real headers and I'll block the
fake one.
"itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net" <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Feb 21 01:51PM -0800

On Monday, February 21, 2022 at 1:02:19 PM UTC-6, joe wrote:
 
> > > I am worth more to here dead than alive ;-)
 
> > If she's lucky Bryan will toss a few death wishes your way.
 
> He may have already done that.
 
Congratulations, you replied to my frogger. Feel better?
Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Feb 21 04:57PM -0500

On 2/21/2022 14:02, joe wrote:
>>> I am worth more to here dead than alive ;-)
 
>> If she's lucky Bryan will toss a few death wishes your way.
 
> He may have already done that.
 
He has, to Dave Smith, on several occasions.
Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Feb 21 04:56PM -0500

On 2/20/2022 19:01, Dave Smith wrote:
> much as he would... but no alimony.
> My wife always earned more than I did and he pension is more than mine.
> That means that she would have to pay me.
 
You seem to be missing the fact that the original discussion was, after
divorce (in the US), the wife can draw on her husband's SS, AND IT
DOESN'T AFFECT THE AMOUNT THE HUSBAND GETS. The husband gets the same
amount of SS either way, but if they were married 10 years, the wife
gets something as well, completely independent of the ex-husband's SS
check. That is entirely different from Alimony (which I don't agree
with, BTW).
"itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net" <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Feb 21 01:57PM -0800

On Monday, February 21, 2022 at 3:01:15 PM UTC-6, Jeßus wrote:
> >Joan's forger again. :(
 
> Sigh. OK, can anyone point out her real headers and I'll block the
> fake one.
 
No, this previous post was made by the real me! Did I confuse anyone
that they're thinking alimony?? I'm talking about Social Security benefits
when a person retires.
Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Feb 21 04:49PM -0500

On 2/20/2022 17:05, Sheldon Martin wrote:
>>> 1 cup thinly sliced sausages, such as Italian sausages or salami
 
>> Salami and mushroom slices are the greatest toppings for pizza.
 
> Anchovie is the greatest topping for pizza... pepperoni comes second.
 
I agree, I can eat only anchovies on pizza. I certainly wouldn't mind
onions, olives, and green peppers with it.
Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Feb 21 04:50PM -0500

On 2/21/2022 8:55, Dave Smith wrote:
 
>> husband won't eat them
 
> I can understand that but, IMO, if you put them on one half you may as
> well put them on both because the entire pizza will be tainted.
 
Are you that sensitive? Unless your oven is on a slant, I doubt that
the other half will taste like anchovies. Only teensy-tiny particles
might make it over there.
Sumbax <Sumbax@nomail.invalid>: Feb 22 08:57AM +1100

On 2/21/2022 8:55, Dave Smith wrote:
 
>> husband won't eat them
 
> I can understand that but, IMO, if you put them on one half you may as
> well put them on both because the entire pizza will be tainted.
 
"tainted" :)
"itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net" <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Feb 21 01:33PM -0800

On Sunday, February 20, 2022 at 11:16:12 PM UTC-6, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> > bored to death while I'm shoveling it in.
 
> And I don't want them to have my name and telephone number after I skip
> out the back door.
 
I thought about that; annoying phone calls and more junk mail. I
couldn't give them as a fake name as I'd have to call and give that
info to reserve a seat.
Sumbax <Sumbax@nomail.invalid>: Feb 22 08:55AM +1100

On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 13:33:57 -0800 (PST), "itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net"
 
>I thought about that; annoying phone calls and more junk mail. I
>couldn't give them as a fake name as I'd have to call and give that
>info to reserve a seat.
 
Can't you say you're Joan Kuthe?
Ed Pawlowski <esp@snet.xxx>: Feb 21 04:54PM -0500

On 2/21/2022 4:30 PM, cshenk wrote:
 
>>> Put it in a jar and added extra-virgin olive oil.
 
> Evidently. You do know the world progressed and women do more thn
> laundry and cooking while watching kids right?
 
Exactly. Somemone has to mow the lawn.
Sumbax <Sumbax@nomail.invalid>: Feb 22 08:37AM +1100

>> that's not too much of a science project.
 
>It is in the produce department. Just looked it up at Publix. I'll
>have to look for it.
 
It's easy to prepare. Cut it up in bite sized chunks and give it a
good whack in the old pan. Or deep fry it. And a bit of salt, of
course.
Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Feb 21 04:37PM -0500

On 2/20/2022 22:49, songbird wrote:
>> Plant based chicken nuggets would be a good choice for McDonald's or KFC to get into selling. Chicken nuggets never did seem like it was real chicken anyways.
 
> LOL no kidding. remember parts is parts?
 
> songbird
 
I, of course, wasn't alive when that aired, but I've heard enough family
members mention it that I immediately got the reference.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_oem9BqUTI
 
(Video: 30 second commercial-in-question)
Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Feb 21 04:46PM -0500

On 2/20/2022 17:44, dsi1 wrote:
>> Cindy Hamilton
 
> That would be about right - according to this photo from the 60's.
 
> https://d3h6k4kfl8m9p0.cloudfront.net/stories/kYen16gOg0PGW2XIadirNA.jpg
 
Wow... was that local to you, or on the mainland?
 
To think that I was complaining about the prices of KFC today... when
you account for inflation, the price of that 21 pc chicken bucket was
over $50-60 in today's money (depending on early or late 60's)... ouch!
I suppose it's always been expensive. My guess, of course, is that
the chicken was far better in the 1960's. Either way, I see why so few
people ate out in the 60's... those prices are certainly a rare-evening
type of deal. Way cheaper to eat at home.
Sumbax <Sumbax@nomail.invalid>: Feb 22 08:53AM +1100

On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 16:31:59 -0500, Michael Trew
>statement. I don't avoid any business for political or personal
>reasons; against their CEO, owner, or whatever. Chick-fil-a is
>delicious.
 
LOL
Ed Pawlowski <esp@snet.xxx>: Feb 21 04:47PM -0500

On 2/21/2022 4:13 PM, Michael Trew wrote:
 
> impatient, and basically tore them apart with a knife in the other hand
> over top of the hot skillet.  Yanno, in a hurry, trying not to over cook
> the eggs already in the skillet below.
 
You need at least one good knife. Don't have to spend a lot to get a
decent Vicotrinox or Furi. At least take the time to get the old knives
in decent shape. Some old ones are great.
"itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net" <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Feb 21 01:39PM -0800

> > or some French fries/steak fries/tater tots?
 
> I don't have any baking potatoes but I do have some frozen steak fries. :)
 
> Jill
 
Dinner is served!!
Sumbax <Sumbax@nomail.invalid>: Feb 22 08:38AM +1100

On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 16:24:13 -0500, jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net>
wrote:
 
 
>All I know is if I had roaches in my house (I don't) and had to
>constantly call an exterminator I sure as heck wouldn't keep announcing
>it to the world.
 
So it's quite possible you have cockroaches.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.food.cooking+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)