- O. T. --- New Vacuum Cleaner --- O. T. - 4 Updates
- RFC spammers - 10 Updates
- Bread Pudding - 3 Updates
- I WORK this evening! - 2 Updates
- My Laptop in my basement is BROKE! - 2 Updates
- Walmart to Close All Stores in Portland amid Record-Breaking Retail Theft - 1 Update
- Mexican breakfast for dinner - 2 Updates
- Today's cooking - 1 Update
| Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Mar 05 11:49PM -0500 On 3/4/2023 13:50, dsi1 wrote: > vacuums have a chronic problem with losing vacuum but that never > seemed to happen with a Filter Queen. I used to connect the hose to > the blower outlet for extra kid fun. I think there was something wrong with the Dirt Devil. It was a cheap model, and the woman who owned it probably beat on it. It still works, so I'll keep using it. You should have seen the house she was living in. Neighbor told me he had to pester her constantly to cut waist high grass. Side window had nothing but cardboard and duct tape covering the broken glass of the last 2 years of her life, while she lived there. Don't even get me started on the fridge, oven, tobacco juice on the walls, etc. The Filter Queen grandma had is a small canister model. It's good to carry out and sweep the car. I have the upright attachment for it also. It's not terribly loud, and it works like a charm all these years later. |
| Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Mar 05 11:51PM -0500 On 3/5/2023 1:30, Bruce wrote: > wrote: >> You're posting as dsi1 as well as Mr. Rogers and numerous others. My guess is that you're ready for a 5150. > Are you saying Greg = Hank? I don't think so. I don't know why David is convinced that they are the same person. Greg might post a fair amount of forged posts, but it's clear as day that Greg and Hank are two different people. |
| Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid>: Mar 06 04:28PM +1100 On Sun, 05 Mar 2023 23:51:38 -0500, Michael Trew >I don't know why David is convinced that they are the same person. Greg >might post a fair amount of forged posts, but it's clear as day that >Greg and Hank are two different people. Yes, they're both trolls but that's the only thing they have in common. |
| GM <gregorymorrowchicago07@gmail.com>: Mar 05 09:56PM -0800 On Sunday, March 5, 2023 at 10:51:44 PM UTC-6, Michael Trew wrote: > I don't know why David is convinced that they are the same person. Greg > might post a fair amount of forged posts, but it's clear as day that > Greg and Hank are two different people. Hank, David and me are ALL the same "entities"... O:-) -- GM |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Mar 05 09:22PM -0500 > On Sunday, March 5, 2023 at 1:28:36 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote: >> Jill and Joan don't nymshift. > Yep, what you see is what you get. And it is so nice to see that testimonial coming from someone who has a history of name shifting and forging usernames of people he does not like knowing that members are more likely to read their posts while they have him filtered. |
| jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net>: Mar 05 09:42PM -0500 > On Sunday, March 5, 2023 at 1:28:36 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote: >> Jill and Joan don't nymshift. > Yep, what you see is what you get. WYSIWYG. I don't understand nymshifting, forging or wading through a bunch of useless bullshit gmail spam posts when there are tools at our disposal to remove them. :) Jill |
| Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid>: Mar 06 03:24PM +1100 On Sun, 5 Mar 2023 21:22:45 -0500, Dave Smith >history of name shifting and forging usernames of people he does not >like knowing that members are more likely to read their posts while they >have him filtered. Only cowards bitch about people they've killfiled. Yes, ladies and gentlemen, that's the Dynamic Sisters: Dave and Jill. |
| Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid>: Mar 06 03:24PM +1100 On Sun, 5 Mar 2023 21:42:32 -0500, jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote: >WYSIWYG. I don't understand nymshifting, forging or wading through a >bunch of useless bullshit gmail spam posts when there are tools at our >disposal to remove them. :) Basically, your entire life's a gated community. |
| Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Mar 06 12:40AM -0500 On 3/5/2023 11:01, GM wrote: >> proverbial "good family" but often act worse than middle school. >> Before you call someone a nasty name, think how it makes you look to >> everyone else. +1 > Yes, Jill for one doesn't acquit herself very well here, what with all of her > rampages and name - calling and lame attempts to "control" the group... > She even referred to the very polite Michael Trew as "snippy" recently, lol... That is probably because it was a bit out of character for me. I did snip at Steve, but he deserved it. I saw that Jill post, and there was no sense in arguing over it, so I read it and moved on. I'm over it; no sense in continuing to dwell over annoyances. I've ignored a number of quoted nasty Janet UK posts, and others; including several Bryan threw my way recently. It's just a waste of time and stress... easier to let it go. |
| Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Mar 06 12:43AM -0500 On 3/5/2023 14:04, Bruce wrote: > On Sun, 5 Mar 2023 08:13:44 -0500, Gary<g.majors@att.net> wrote: >> Do like me, just sit back, read and laugh. > Yes, that's what RFC is for :) Sometimes I almost fall out of my chair laughing. Reading the insanity here is worth the time invested. Y'all are a riot. Yes, I even laugh at many of Hank posts, which seem to irritate you. > I can just see Cindy Unixing the night away trying to get her killfile > right. "Unixing"... Lol. I'd say doubtful; Cindy goes to bed before the sun sets. |
| Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Mar 06 12:45AM -0500 On 3/5/2023 9:51, Gary wrote: > message bodies. This puts them all on my computer so when I click on > each one, instant new message. Passing up the true spam only takes a few > minutes (out of the 200 new). I don't know about that. I've spent in the upwards of 20 minutes just skimming through spam posts. It takes seconds to add an address/name to a KF, and block a number of future SPAM posts. Sorry, I've got to lean into Jill's side here. I sure wouldn't want to have to click off all of those messages each time I check in. |
| GM <gregorymorrowchicago07@gmail.com>: Mar 05 09:52PM -0800 On Sunday, March 5, 2023 at 11:40:25 PM UTC-6, Michael Trew wrote: > ignored a number of quoted nasty Janet UK posts, and others; including > several Bryan threw my way recently. It's just a waste of time and > stress... easier to let it go. Janet UK is seemingly "MIA" as of late... B-) -- GM |
| Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid>: Mar 06 04:53PM +1100 On Mon, 06 Mar 2023 00:43:30 -0500, Michael Trew >Sometimes I almost fall out of my chair laughing. Reading the insanity >here is worth the time invested. Y'all are a riot. Yes, I even laugh >at many of Hank posts, which seem to irritate you. I don't read many of them. It's always about farts and anuses. >> I can just see Cindy Unixing the night away trying to get her killfile >> right. >"Unixing"... Lol. I'd say doubtful; Cindy goes to bed before the sun sets. Maybe from 6 to 8 pm then. |
| Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid>: Mar 06 04:54PM +1100 On Mon, 06 Mar 2023 00:45:18 -0500, Michael Trew >a KF, and block a number of future SPAM posts. Sorry, I've got to lean >into Jill's side here. I sure wouldn't want to have to click off all of >those messages each time I check in. 20 minutes worth of spam posts? When I download say 60 posts after I get up, maybe 2 of them are from spammers. |
| jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net>: Mar 05 09:57PM -0500 >> https://www.flickr.com/photos/36178182@N08/52727841797/in/dateposted-public/ >> --Bryan > Your fire looks far too low. Your steaks look like they need a good sear. Yep, the coals are far too low and although the steaks do have have grill marks yet they look pathetically *dry*. Jill |
| Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Mar 06 12:49AM -0500 On 3/5/2023 19:38, dsi1 wrote: >> was dumb that the country had the same name as the bird. > Beats the heck out of me. I still call the place "Constantinople." > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XlO39kCQ-8 That was weird. I was fully expecting your link to take me to the Four Lads singing. I was mildly disappointed. I'll fix it for you, below: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wcze7EGorOk |
| Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Mar 06 12:53AM -0500 >>> nice little punch :) >> She only used rum because she couldn't get crystal palace. > I'm not familiar with crystal palace, what was it? Sounds like a gin. Sheldon's favorite brand of vodka. Best stuff in the universe, I've heard. |
| Bryan Simmons <bryangsimmons@gmail.com>: Mar 05 06:27PM -0800 On Sunday, March 5, 2023 at 8:14:30 PM UTC-6, Thomas wrote: > You have zero integrity. > If not for people vouching that you are a real person > I would bet large that you are not. Good for you that you're not a professional gambler, or you'd starve. > Write down every single thing you do in the next week > and read it back to see if you approve of yourself. Your opinion is close to worthless. --Bryan |
| Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Mar 06 12:35AM -0500 On 3/5/2023 21:27, Bryan Simmons wrote: > On Sunday, March 5, 2023 at 8:14:30 PM UTC-6, Thomas wrote: >> If not for people vouching that you are a real person >> I would bet large that you are not. John is, in fact, real. I got photographic evidence, heh. >> and read it back to see if you approve of yourself. > Your opinion is close to worthless. > --Bryan I don't think that his post was directed at you; it was toward John. |
| Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Mar 06 12:06AM -0500 On 3/5/2023 8:55, Gary wrote: >> 7+ years later). > 30 seconds to boot? That would be a wake up from "sleep" not a full > reboot from total shutdown. No, I'm talking about from a full shut-down. It's well under 30 seconds from sleep mode. Solid state drives are extremely fast booting, compared to HDD models. I maybe have been exaggerating slightly on 30 seconds, but it's well under a minute start-up to desktop from full shut-down. 45 seconds, tops. |
| Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid>: Mar 06 04:30PM +1100 On Mon, 06 Mar 2023 00:06:28 -0500, Michael Trew >No, I'm talking about from a full shut-down. It's well under 30 seconds >from sleep mode. Solid state drives are extremely fast booting, >compared to HDD models. I have an SSD drive, but 30 seconds? Nah. |
| Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Mar 06 12:28AM -0500 On 3/5/2023 17:46, Hank Rogers wrote: >> "This coffee maker works" >> This HP laser printer works... > Mike Trew is probably heading your way right now! Eh, just a little too far. |
| Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Mar 05 11:41PM -0500 On 3/5/2023 7:15, Bryan Simmons wrote: > enjoyment of the meal, even as it made the cooking of it more > difficult. > --Bryan I thought you said that weed was "icky". It doesn't bother me when people smoke it, but I just don't get it. Like any drug/alcohol/whatever, what's the appeal to dependency and/or loss of control, impaired judgment, etc.? My neighbor's a nice guy, and we help each other out from time to time, moving furniture, etc... but most of what he does all day is get high. I guess, whatever floats your boat. I asked him for a ride to go pick up a truck yesterday, and offered gas money, but he said that he was "so high, that he couldn't even figure out how to open the bag of M&M's", and he gave up on it... so he figured that probably shouldn't drive. Lol. |
| Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid>: Mar 06 04:26PM +1100 On Sun, 05 Mar 2023 23:41:00 -0500, Michael Trew >people smoke it, but I just don't get it. Like any >drug/alcohol/whatever, what's the appeal to dependency and/or loss of >control, impaired judgment, etc.? Did your granny and your parents ever drink alcohol? |
| Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net>: Mar 06 12:17AM -0500 On 3/4/2023 12:04, Gary wrote: > - sweet potatoes > - salt, thyme, tarragon, mustard powder, bay leaves > - 10 cups of water Do you just simmer it all together, or do you sautee the veggies (sans peas) in oil first? |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.food.cooking+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment