- Gochujang Is So Much More Than a Condiment - 4 Updates
- I am BACK! - 2 Updates
- OT: Nashville Shooter, A Tranny FREAK, Kills SIX :-( - 15 Updates
- People who think they're attractive are less likely to wear masks, a study shows - 2 Updates
- Aunt Jemima - 1 Update
- Air Fryer Loaded Potato - 1 Update
| GM <gregorymorrowchicago07@gmail.com>: Apr 03 04:08PM -0700 On Monday, April 3, 2023 at 5:41:31 PM UTC-5, Bryan Simmons wrote: > > they are *most* welcome to go fuck themselves... > > There is nothing more frustrating than someone providing links that are either paywalled, or require "registration" to view... > I wouldn't want to discourage you from reading the NY Times. It's a vile leftist rag, but they have some okay food articles, and as a history buff I love perusing their archives... -- GM |
| Ed P <esp@snet.xxx>: Apr 03 09:23PM -0400 On 4/3/2023 7:08 PM, GM wrote: >> I wouldn't want to discourage you from reading the NY Times. > It's a vile leftist rag, but they have some okay food articles, and as a history buff I love perusing their archives... It is so vile yet you use it for searches? Isn't that hypocritical? Which newspaper has the best reputation? The New York Times For more than 150 years, Times readers have expected their newspaper to provide the most thorough and uncompromising coverage in the world. The Times has won more Pulitzer prizes than any other news organization and remains No. 1 in overall reach of U.S. opinion leaders How reliable is The Times newspaper? A Reuters Institute survey in 2021 put the number of digital subscribers at around 400,000, and ranked The Times as having the sixth highest trust rating out of 13 different outlets polled. The Times Digital Archive is available by subscription. |
| GM <gregorymorrowchicago07@gmail.com>: Apr 03 07:13PM -0700 On Monday, April 3, 2023 at 8:23:34 PM UTC-5, Ed P wrote: > > It's a vile leftist rag, but they have some okay food articles, and as a history buff I love perusing their archives... > It is so vile yet you use it for searches? Isn't that hypocritical? Of course not - I have a historical "bent", ya know... > For more than 150 years, Times readers have expected their newspaper to > provide the most thorough and uncompromising coverage in the world. The > Times has won more Pulitzer prizes than any other news organization Sure, they even got Pulitzers for Stalin apologists* (Walter Duranty) and more recently, " Russia gate " - which was exposed as a TOTAL hoax... These days, a Pulitzer ain't worth even the price of a prize in a Cracker Jack box... They've been doing the " fake nooze "schtickle for 90 years now: https://www.npr.org/2022/05/08/1097097620/new-york-times-pulitzer-ukraine-walter-duranty *The New York Times' can't shake the cloud over a 90-year-old Pulitzer Prize The New York Times is looking to add to its list of 132 Pulitzer Prizes — by far the most of any news organization — when the 2022 recipients for journalism are announced on Monday. Yet the war in Ukraine has renewed questions of whether the Times should return a Pulitzer awarded 90 years ago for work by Walter Duranty, its charismatic chief correspondent in the Soviet Union. "He is the personification of evil in journalism," says Oksana Piaseckyj, a Ukrainian-American activist who came to the U.S. as a child refugee in 1950. She is among the advocates for the return of the award. "We think he was like the originator of fake news." and > at around 400,000, and ranked The Times as having the sixth highest > trust rating out of 13 different outlets polled. The Times Digital > Archive is available by subscription. "Lol, Ed!" ;-P -- GM |
| Hank Rogers <hank@nospam.invalid>: Apr 03 09:18PM -0500 GM wrote: >> Archive is available by subscription. > "Lol, Ed!" > ;-P When trump gets elected next year, he will get rid of that vile leftist rag. |
| Hank Rogers <hank@nospam.invalid>: Apr 03 07:13PM -0500 Thomas Joseph wrote: > want to take a chance I can by clicking "OK" - but when I do > it asks me to sign in with my ID and I am afraid that if I > do so I won't be able to get back to my old ID. It wants your apple ID, right? If you have more than one, you can sign in with whichever you want. If you later need to use the other ID, just sign out from the current apple ID, then you can sign in with the other whenever you want. Sometimes apple and their ID is a real PITA. |
| Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Apr 03 09:59PM -0400 On 2023-04-03 5:55 p.m., jmcquown wrote: > will stink. When I was a teenager my mother had a small strawberry > patch next to the house. We started smelling something foul (or should > that be fowl? LOL) Upon investigating we discovered a small dead sparrow. That Malinois I had loved to roll in dead things. One spring he used to come back from his runs in the woods with a stench that was getting stronger and stronger. I stopped taking him back to the field where he seemed to find it but he was fast and had a mind of his own, though he always came back. My son and I took him for a run but stayed well away from that field. He went for his run and came back. He very rotten raccoon spine stuck in his training collar. I grabbed a stick to try to loosen it was so foul smelling that we almost puked. We took him to the house and gave him a bath in the back yard. He was shampooed, rinsed repeated three times before we got the smell off him. That part of the lawn where he had his bath stunk for about a week. |
| Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid>: Apr 04 08:46AM +1000 >I suppose the vigils take the place of church services. >One thing I can never understand is why do people feel it necessary >to dump flowers and teddy bears at a murder or accident site. Maybe to express empathy/sympathy? Do you struggle with many things? |
| GM <gregorymorrowchicago07@gmail.com>: Apr 03 04:13PM -0700 On Monday, April 3, 2023 at 5:44:45 PM UTC-5, Graham wrote: > I suppose the vigils take the place of church services. > One thing I can never understand is why do people feel it necessary > to dump flowers and teddy bears at a murder or accident site. My word, what an ice -cold heart have you, Graham...!!! O:-) -- GM |
| "itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net" <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Apr 03 04:37PM -0700 On Monday, April 3, 2023 at 5:44:45 PM UTC-5, Graham wrote: > One thing I can never understand is why do people feel it necessary > to dump flowers and teddy bears at a murder or accident site. That's one thing that has always puzzled me, too. Who's going to enjoy those teddy bears?? Let's not forget these displays usually have a few dozen balloons as well. |
| lucretia@florence.it: Apr 03 08:41PM -0300 >I suppose the vigils take the place of church services. >One thing I can never understand is why do people feel it necessary >to dump flowers and teddy bears at a murder or accident site. No but I suppose it helps some. Years ago a kid was killed by a school bus near where I lived outside of town. Instantly there were masses of teddies etc. I thought it was terrible that they were still there when it snowed and the plough came along - what a ghastly looking mess :( I think your point is interesting, maybe it's because it takes the place of gatherings at the church. |
| lucretia@florence.it: Apr 03 08:42PM -0300 On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 08:44:56 +1000, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote: >defended him by saying Diana was a cheater too -which she wasn't until >after Charles had ruined their marriage. Graham called him King Chuck. >Etc, etc. Don't remember? So my comment was actually about Diana? |
| Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid>: Apr 04 09:51AM +1000 >>after Charles had ruined their marriage. Graham called him King Chuck. >>Etc, etc. Don't remember? >So my comment was actually about Diana? You were defending Cheating Charlie. |
| jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net>: Apr 03 09:45PM -0400 On 4/3/2023 6:44 PM, Graham wrote: > I suppose the vigils take the place of church services. > One thing I can never understand is why do people feel it necessary > to dump flowers and teddy bears at a murder or accident site. I don't quite understand why there are crosses and bouquets of flowers at sites of roadside accidents. Usually seen out in the country. Does the grieving family really go back and keep laying fresh flowers next to a cross where someone was killed in a car accident? I find it odd, to say the least. Jill |
| Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca>: Apr 03 06:49PM -0600 On 2023-04-03 7:45 p.m., jmcquown wrote: > a cross where someone was killed in a car accident? I find it odd, to > say the least. > Jill It seems to be a modern take on ancient civilisation's grave gifts. |
| Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid>: Apr 04 10:58AM +1000 On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 21:45:23 -0400, jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> wrote: >the grieving family really go back and keep laying fresh flowers next to >a cross where someone was killed in a car accident? I find it odd, to >say the least. No, aliens put them there. |
| Ed P <esp@snet.xxx>: Apr 03 09:16PM -0400 On 4/3/2023 7:13 PM, GM wrote: >> to dump flowers and teddy bears at a murder or accident site. > My word, what an ice -cold heart have you, Graham...!!! > O:-) OK, then explain the ritual. I never understood it either. I don't see any value to buy a bunch of flowers and dump them on a pile of other flowers to be carted off to the dump. Perhaps the teddy bears can be salvaged and given away. |
| Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca>: Apr 03 07:19PM -0600 On 2023-04-03 7:16 p.m., Ed P wrote: >>> to dump flowers and teddy bears at a murder or accident site. >> My word, what an ice -cold heart have you, Graham...!!! >> O:-) Trump supporters lack hearts! |
| Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid>: Apr 04 11:22AM +1000 >any value to buy a bunch of flowers and dump them on a pile of other >flowers to be carted off to the dump. Perhaps the teddy bears can be >salvaged and given away. Not that I've ever done anything like that, but I guess it makes the person who puts flowers etc. there, feel a little bit better. It's not about practical use or monetary value. |
| Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid>: Apr 04 11:22AM +1000 >>> My word, what an ice -cold heart have you, Graham...!!! >>> O:-) >Trump supporters lack hearts! And brains. It's a miracle they can walk. |
| GM <gregorymorrowchicago07@gmail.com>: Apr 03 06:50PM -0700 On Monday, April 3, 2023 at 8:19:36 PM UTC-5, Graham wrote: > >> My word, what an ice -cold heart have you, Graham...!!! > >> O:-) > Trump supporters lack hearts! Graham, all who know me say, "That Greg SURE is a loverly fellow - he LIVES on LOVE...!!!" O:-) -- GM |
| GM <gregorymorrowchicago07@gmail.com>: Apr 03 06:57PM -0700 On Monday, April 3, 2023 at 8:16:21 PM UTC-5, Ed P wrote: > any value to buy a bunch of flowers and dump them on a pile of other > flowers to be carted off to the dump. Perhaps the teddy bears can be > salvaged and given away. Don't be daft, Ed... It's the same thing as us Christians setting a place for The Christ Child at one's Christmas dinner table... It's about the "spirit" of "things"...!!! B-) -- GM |
| Ed P <esp@snet.xxx>: Apr 03 09:11PM -0400 On 4/3/2023 6:07 PM, T wrote: > Here you go and this is THE LAST TIME I WILL > PRESENT THE EVIDENCE TO YOU. I will not play > your "where's the proof" games with you. How about real evidence. I twisted nothing https://www.oah.org/tah/issues/2015/august/vaccination-resistance/ https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/05/the-people-who-wont-get-the-vaccine/618765/ https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-021-12114-8 |
| T <T@invalid.invalid>: Apr 03 06:53PM -0700 On 4/3/23 18:11, Ed P wrote: >> your "where's the proof" games with you. > How about real evidence. I twisted nothing > https://www.oah.org/tah/issues/2015/august/vaccination-resistance/ An opinion piece and historical views on real vaccines is not scientific evidence. You are trying to pain anyone who does not agree with your narrative as anti-vax. You are twisting and smearing others. > https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/05/the-people-who-wont-get-the-vaccine/618765/ Another o pinon piece. This is NOT science. > https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-021-12114-8 This also has nothing to do with scientific evidence. Ed, I showed data and charts based on the data of the dangers of TH*S not-a-real-vaccine vaccine. This is how science works. Yo on the the other hand showed only opinion. Your "opinions" are not science. This is why you resort to smearing and lying about others. |
| Mike Duffy <mxduffy@bell.net>: Apr 04 01:20AM On 2023-04-03, Thomas Joseph wrote: > Are you saying you were encouraged to guess > the answers to all questions right from the start? That is > interesting. How about multiple choice? No. The course was the integration of multidimensional differential equations. You got a mathematical expression, and were required to integrate it. Essentially, everyone was expected at that point to be able to differentiate equations. Simple algebraic equations can be integrated term by term, but not more complex ones. So for a test or exam question, you would more or less look at an expression and ask yourself: "Okay, what math expression will produce this when it is differentiated? Remarkably, the answer would often just come into my mind unprovoked by any sort of rational erudition. |
| Bryan Simmons <bryangsimmons@gmail.com>: Apr 03 05:06PM -0700 On Monday, April 3, 2023 at 3:34:59 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote: > > Is Nigela still as elegant and pretty as I remember? :) > > leo > I think she's been replaced with Padma Lakshmi - who will be replaced by another cutie pie soon. You find Padma Lakshmi pretty? She's only marginally better looking than Stormy Daniels. --Bryan |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.food.cooking+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment