Sunday, January 3, 2021

Digest for rec.food.cooking@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 9 topics

"cshenk" <cshenk1@cox.net>: Jan 03 05:38PM -0600

dsi1 wrote:
 
 
> > > Um, says lunch, shit stirrer fail!. DUH
> > My wife's serving wasn't much larger today, and she considered it a
> > meal.
 
https://www.flickr.com/photos/15522299@N08/50797176202/in/dateposted-public/
> whenever we have cashews. I could make it meatless by using tofu and
> it would be just as scrumptious.
> https://photos.app.goo.gl/1HTSJWFfdmTeDftaA
 
WAAH! I want more greens!
 
(Yes, looks good!)
dsi1 <dsi123@hawaiiantel.net>: Jan 03 05:03PM -0800

On Sunday, January 3, 2021 at 12:23:37 PM UTC-10, Master Bruce wrote:
> >https://photos.app.goo.gl/1HTSJWFfdmTeDftaA
> I like adding cashews to Asian style dishes, except I always eat them
> before we get around to cooking.
I get a big container of cashews from Costco but my wife likes to munch on them. Next time, I better get 2.
Master Bruce <masterbruce@null.null>: Jan 04 10:44AM +1100

>> In 2019 there were only 90 baby girls named Sheila.
>> 1 out of every 20,254 baby girls born in 2019 are named Sheila.
 
>Even in Australia?
 
Without going to Google or Wikipedia, I've never met or even heard of
a woman who was actually called Sheila, except for Sheila E., but
she's American. I think Bruce used to be a common male name. Probably
not anymore.
Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 03 07:28PM -0500

On 2021-01-03 5:33 p.m., Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> Well, that´s a fun site! My name is just as popular as I thought it
>> was.
 
> You came in 40 to my 348.  (Edwin)
I beat you both. David was 27. However, I get no credit for it. It was
my parents who named me. Even worse, it is not even my first name. My
first name is down in the 400s. I have always gone by by second name.
 
\
> All the Leo's I know are over 60.  I guess it was even more popular
> years ago.
I have a 7 year old great nephew named Leo.
 
 
 
> Only thing with my name is people assume my fill name is Edward.  If you
> call me that, chances are I will ignore you.
 
My father's older brother was Edward, but he always went by Ted. His
second name was Dunstan, and I have no idea where that came from.
 
 
 
 
> Joan was the 1165th most popular boys name and 1595th most popular girls
> name.
> In 2019 there were 165 baby boys and 132 baby girls named Joan.
 
 
It is a touchy topic these days. Goodness knows why, but some people
want to keep their kid's sex a secret these days, maybe they are really
looking for a sense of curiosity. When I go to one of the Canadian Tire
stores in the area I always seem to end up with the same cashier, an
androgynous young person. He was very feminine looking, or she was quite
masculine area. It's dangerous to look at name tags these days because
it may be mistaken for checking out boobs... Pat!!!!! argh
Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 03 07:29PM -0500

On 2021-01-03 5:51 p.m., Graham wrote:
>> name.
>> In 2019 there were 165 baby boys and 132 baby girls named Joan.
 
> I think Bruce's real name is Sheilah:-)
 
Only on Saturday nights.
Master Bruce <masterbruce@null.null>: Jan 04 11:44AM +1100

On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 19:28:38 -0500, Dave Smith
 
>I beat you both. David was 27. However, I get no credit for it. It was
>my parents who named me. Even worse, it is not even my first name. My
>first name is down in the 400s. I have always gone by by second name.
 
Let me guess: You're first name is Petty.
 
>> call me that, chances are I will ignore you.
 
>My father's older brother was Edward, but he always went by Ted. His
>second name was Dunstan, and I have no idea where that came from.
 
Short for Dungstain?
Hank Rogers <Nospam@invalid.com>: Jan 03 06:48PM -0600

Master Bruce wrote:
 
>> My father's older brother was Edward, but he always went by Ted. His
>> second name was Dunstan, and I have no idea where that came from.
 
> Short for Dungstain?
 
Maybe, so have a whiff master!
dsi1 <dsi123@hawaiiantel.net>: Jan 03 04:56PM -0800

On Sunday, January 3, 2021 at 2:28:44 PM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
> androgynous young person. He was very feminine looking, or she was quite
> masculine area. It's dangerous to look at name tags these days because
> it may be mistaken for checking out boobs... Pat!!!!! argh
 
My understanding is that it's a thing these days to have a party before the kid is delivered. The purpose, of which, is to have the baby's gender revealed. That's so goofy!
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/10/style/gender-reveal-parties-cursed.html
Master Bruce <masterbruce@null.null>: Jan 04 12:02PM +1100

On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 16:56:10 -0800 (PST), dsi1 <dsi123@hawaiiantel.net>
wrote:
 
>> it may be mistaken for checking out boobs... Pat!!!!! argh
 
>My understanding is that it's a thing these days to have a party before the kid is delivered. The purpose, of which, is to have the baby's gender revealed. That's so goofy!
>https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/10/style/gender-reveal-parties-cursed.html
 
No, be up to date and woke please. Parents don't reveal the gender of
the child. How would they know? The child will reveal its gender when
it's ready to do so.
Leo <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net>: Jan 03 03:50PM -0800

On 2021 Jan 1, , dsi1 wrote
 
> I have a theory that one could do that to himself by using rubber bands. You
> just cut off the blood circulation until your Johnson falls off. I'm hoping
> that someone like Hank will test it to see if it works.
 
Your theory works! Buy them here.
 
<https://www.tractorsupply.com/tsc/product/producers-pride-castrating-bands-
pack-of-100-2221563>
 
The bands are cheap, but you need the tool for another ten bucks, and
they´re for the plums, not the Johnson. Your solution is viable and old-hat
to cattle ranchers at around 15 cents a pop plus labor.
Master Bruce <masterbruce@null.null>: Jan 04 10:52AM +1100

On Fri, 1 Jan 2021 16:02:07 -0800 (PST), dsi1 <dsi123@hawaiiantel.net>
wrote:
 
 
>> > Castration.
 
>> I wonder if Amazon would sell a DIY kit.
 
>I have a theory that one could do that to himself by using rubber bands. You just cut off the blood circulation until your Johnson falls off. I'm hoping that someone like Hank will test it to see if it works.
 
I think he already tried it and it worked, which is why he's now so
focused on the other side.
dsi1 <dsi123@hawaiiantel.net>: Jan 03 04:39PM -0800

On Sunday, January 3, 2021 at 1:50:30 PM UTC-10, Leo wrote:
 
> The bands are cheap, but you need the tool for another ten bucks, and
> they´re for the plums, not the Johnson. Your solution is viable and old-hat
> to cattle ranchers at around 15 cents a pop plus labor.
I can't get on the page because the site conserves bandwidth by not allowing people from Hawaii access. That's okay, I've seen rubber bands before. My guess is that it would be pretty distressing to be around when the balls start dropping to the ground. Thanks.
dsi1 <dsi123@hawaiiantel.net>: Jan 03 04:41PM -0800

On Sunday, January 3, 2021 at 1:52:54 PM UTC-10, Master Bruce wrote:
 
> >I have a theory that one could do that to himself by using rubber bands. You just cut off the blood circulation until your Johnson falls off. I'm hoping that someone like Hank will test it to see if it works.
> I think he already tried it and it worked, which is why he's now so
> focused on the other side.
You're wrong yet again. My probable is the exact opposite. Let me tell you, having a 7.5" Johnson is not all rainbows and lollies!
Master Bruce <masterbruce@null.null>: Jan 04 11:55AM +1100

On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 16:41:32 -0800 (PST), dsi1 <dsi123@hawaiiantel.net>
wrote:
 
>> I think he already tried it and it worked, which is why he's now so
>> focused on the other side.
>You're wrong yet again. My probable is the exact opposite. Let me tell you, having a 7.5" Johnson is not all rainbows and lollies!
 
But I was talking about Hank.
"cshenk" <cshenk1@cox.net>: Jan 03 05:36PM -0600

Ed Pawlowski wrote:
 
> on a grilled swordfish.
 
> Do you put salt on fries? Salt and pepper on eggs? Ketchup on a
> burger? Same thing, personal preference.
 
Agreed, just not my personal thing to add.
Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 03 07:40PM -0500

On 2021-01-03 6:36 p.m., cshenk wrote:
 
>> Do you put salt on fries? Salt and pepper on eggs? Ketchup on a
>> burger? Same thing, personal preference.
 
> Agreed, just not my personal thing to add.
 
We have got into the habit of having mango and avocado salsa with trout
and salmon. It is really good and incredibly easy to make. Chop up
some mango, avocado and red onion and sprinkle with lime juice. For a
little extra oomph I had a little very finely minced hot pepper. I had
just enough to add a little zip to it without making it really hot.
Sqwertz <sqwertzme@gmail.invalid>: Jan 03 05:34PM -0600

On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 16:07:39 -0500, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
 
>> address?
 
> All I see here is Joe Namath. Now that the enrollment date has passed
> he is gone. He was very annoying.
 
Oh, is that Joe Namath? I thought it was Tarkenten. Duh. All
those old fogies look the same to me!
 
Okay - anybody know where Joe Namath lives?
 
-sw
Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca>: Jan 03 07:35PM -0500

On 2021-01-03 6:34 p.m., Sqwertz wrote:
 
> Oh, is that Joe Namath? I thought it was Tarkenten. Duh. All
> those old fogies look the same to me!
 
> Okay - anybody know where Joe Namath lives?
 
Google is your friend. He lives in Jupiter Fl.
Sqwertz <sqwertzme@gmail.invalid>: Jan 03 05:45PM -0600

On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 16:46:57 -0500, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
 
 
> According to the Vita label, a 2 oz serving is 440mg, 18% of sodium
> intake. So, looks like 216% in 24 oz. Did you have chips with them?
 
> I'd skip the bacon for breakfast and ham sandwich for lunch that day.
 
This was my breakfast:
 
https://i.postimg.cc/xd7BGtjm/Smoked-Brisket-Plate.jpg
 
That's potato salad with mixed spicy olives.
 
-sw
Master Bruce <masterbruce@null.null>: Jan 04 10:50AM +1100

On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 17:45:31 -0600, Sqwertz <sqwertzme@gmail.invalid>
wrote:
 
 
>This was my breakfast:
 
>https://i.postimg.cc/xd7BGtjm/Smoked-Brisket-Plate.jpg
 
>That's potato salad with mixed spicy olives.
 
Potato salad with olives? All I see is a deceased animal.
Sqwertz <sqwertzme@gmail.invalid>: Jan 03 05:56PM -0600

On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 16:46:57 -0500, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
 
 
> According to the Vita label, a 2 oz serving is 440mg, 18% of sodium
> intake. So, looks like 216% in 24 oz. Did you have chips with them?
 
> I'd skip the bacon for breakfast and ham sandwich for lunch that day.
 
Correction: It was 26 ounces.
 
-sw
Master Bruce <masterbruce@null.null>: Jan 04 11:25AM +1100

On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 17:56:54 -0600, Sqwertz <sqwertzme@gmail.invalid>
wrote:
 
>> intake. So, looks like 216% in 24 oz. Did you have chips with them?
 
>> I'd skip the bacon for breakfast and ham sandwich for lunch that day.
 
>Correction: It was 26 ounces.
 
Thanks, I was wondering.
Sqwertz <sqwertzme@gmail.invalid>: Jan 03 06:01PM -0600

On Sat, 2 Jan 2021 14:47:36 -0800 (PST), itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net
wrote:
 
> Those little self-sticking 'dots' can be purchased at Home Depot or Lowe's.
 
Mine are kinda smashed, and I'm going to Lowes soon to get some real
pine cleaner (Pine-Sol no longer has pine in it, they nixed it 8-9
years ago, those bastards).
 
-sw
Sqwertz <sqwertzme@gmail.invalid>: Jan 03 05:59PM -0600

On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 07:37:16 -0800 (PST), Thomas wrote:
 
>> I think tert has abandoned you. All you got left is me now.
 
>> -sw
> I can feel the love.
 
That's the wet dream I had last night.
 
-sw
Sqwertz <sqwertzme@gmail.invalid>: Jan 03 05:42PM -0600

On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 13:36:31 -0500, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
 
> I just noticed this in the meat case. It's a brand of chicken and beef
> stock that is sold in plastic bottles and refrigerated. It says "only 3
> ingredients" which are water, meat, and carrots. Anyone ever try it?
 
The poepl that make that are a hugely popular rotiserrie chicken
truck (a fleet of them) in the Bay Area.
 
But I'll pass on the broth at $10 for 24oz.
 
-sw
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.food.cooking+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)