- OT: a very basic cell phone question - 9 Updates
- OT Weather in Da Lou this AM: The Triple Point Of Water! ;-) - 3 Updates
- Burned by Walmart beans again. - 4 Updates
- Southern Pulled Pork BBQ, crockpot - 5 Updates
- Miss "Whore Boots" not named "Most Admired Woman" ?? - 1 Update
- Lunch today - 2 Updates
- OT I GOT A JOB! :-) - 1 Update
songbird <songbird@anthive.com>: Jan 04 02:58PM -0500 Gary wrote: > company phone with that for many years but never knew the details. > My question: Do those 500 minutes only apply to outgoing calls that I > instigate or do incoming calls also deduct from that limit? depends upon the carrier/plan. ours is counted both ways in or out all counts in the plan. we just switched ours the past few weeks. still getting it figured out and used to it. i don't know what is long distance or not or if it doesn't matter any more. they don't mention this in their guides at all. songbird |
Ed Pawlowski <esp@snet.xxx>: Jan 04 03:09PM -0500 On 1/4/2021 2:32 PM, Master Bruce wrote: >>> instigate or do incoming calls also deduct from that limit? >> Total use, in or out. > Wut? Doesn't the person who calls you already pay for the call? Still using the tower and air time though. If I pay my carrier for my landline they still have to provide you cell time to receive. |
Beez Neez <from-the@hi.ve>: Jan 04 12:17PM -0800 On 1/4/2021 8:37 AM, Gary wrote: > company phone with that for many years but never knew the details. > My question: Do those 500 minutes only apply to outgoing calls that I > instigate or do incoming calls also deduct from that limit? Call the provider and ask them. They are the most reliable source of information. You can probably find the answer to this and many other questions on the provider's customer support web page. Asking a bunch of strangers in a cooking newsgroup is an exercise in futility. |
Master Bruce <masterbruce@null.null>: Jan 05 07:25AM +1100 >> Wut? Doesn't the person who calls you already pay for the call? >Still using the tower and air time though. If I pay my carrier for my >landline they still have to provide you cell time to receive. The idea that someone calls me and I have to pay for it is very weird to me. But I hardly use a mobile phone, so what do I know? |
Master Bruce <masterbruce@null.null>: Jan 05 07:25AM +1100 On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 19:45:23 +0000, S Viemeister >> You don't pay for incoming calls. Would be a hoot, otherwise. >I've had a contract which charged for both in _and_ out. In the US. Most >of the rest of the world doesn't do that, though. Oh, that might be why I've never heard of it. |
Master Bruce <masterbruce@null.null>: Jan 05 07:27AM +1100 On Tue, 05 Jan 2021 06:24:14 +1100, Master Bruce >>My question: Do those 500 minutes only apply to outgoing calls that I >>instigate or do incoming calls also deduct from that limit? >You don't pay for incoming calls. Would be a hoot, otherwise. Gary, on second thought: when your mother calls, don't let her keep you on the phone for 500 minutes, because you'd blow your allowance for the month! |
Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca>: Jan 04 01:44PM -0700 On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 19:45:23 +0000, S Viemeister wrote: >> You don't pay for incoming calls. Would be a hoot, otherwise. > I've had a contract which charged for both in _and_ out. In the US. Most > of the rest of the world doesn't do that, though. Same for texts. When I got my first "smart" phone, I received some spam texts that would have cost me if I hadn't protested. My basic plan is for X minutes, which I have never exceeded ( I have no idea what the number is). |
"itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net" <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Jan 04 01:04PM -0800 On Monday, January 4, 2021 at 10:37:23 AM UTC-6, Gary wrote: > company phone with that for many years but never knew the details. > My question: Do those 500 minutes only apply to outgoing calls that I > instigate or do incoming calls also deduct from that limit? My first cell phone was a Tracfone flip phone, after it died I bought a Tracfone smartphone from HSN with 1500 minutes of talk and text time. The 400 minutes or so of the original phone rolled over into that new service. I renew service once a year with the bare minimum minutes I can purchase for $50. This saves me from buying a minutes card every month or few months. |
Cindy Hamilton <angelicapaganelli@yahoo.com>: Jan 04 01:25PM -0800 On Monday, January 4, 2021 at 3:26:04 PM UTC-5, Master Bruce wrote: > >I've had a contract which charged for both in _and_ out. In the US. Most > >of the rest of the world doesn't do that, though. > Oh, that might be why I've never heard of it. My contract is a fixed rate per month, with unlimited calling and texting. It's a lot more expensive than these "minutes" plans, but I'm willing to pay for the convenience of never running out, never adding minutes, etc. My mother's phone is also on my contract, and it's well worth it to know that when she needs an Uber, she doesn't need to worry about whether her phone will do the job. Cindy Hamilton |
"Ophelia" <ophelia@elsinore.me.uk>: Jan 04 08:59PM "Master Bruce" wrote in message news:o2q6vf9qfnphorbcpu3vouuflc2s0oa3mg@4ax.com... On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 11:29:26 -0000, "Ophelia" <ophelia@elsinore.me.uk> wrote: >Yes, or Pat Boone. >==== >Oh my :) Memories? :) ==== Yes:))) |
"itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net" <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Jan 04 01:07PM -0800 On Monday, January 4, 2021 at 5:28:35 AM UTC-6, dsi1 wrote: > I'm not even sure what a Mars bar is. It is a Snickers candy bar minus the peanuts. |
Master Bruce <masterbruce@null.null>: Jan 05 08:25AM +1100 On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 13:07:17 -0800 (PST), "itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net" >On Monday, January 4, 2021 at 5:28:35 AM UTC-6, dsi1 wrote: >> I'm not even sure what a Mars bar is. >It is a Snickers candy bar minus the peanuts. I prefer a Snickers. |
Sheldon Martin <penmart01@aol.com>: Jan 04 03:27PM -0500 >I suspect Graham was referring to adjective Sheila. >Aren't all women in Australia referred to as a Sheila? >At least that's what we westerners have been told. I once knew a gal named Shiela... Shiela the Peeler, she peeled like a tangerine. LOL |
Sheldon Martin <penmart01@aol.com>: Jan 04 03:34PM -0500 >8th grade class picture. The folder was signed by some of my >classmates, including Sheila. Only one I can recall. Had she not >signed the folder I'd not have recalled her either. Sheila was a populer girls name in the late 40s early 50s. |
dsi1 <dsi123@hawaiiantel.net>: Jan 04 12:59PM -0800 On Sunday, January 3, 2021 at 3:33:28 PM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote: > went to great lengths to conceal the gender of their child. They named > the kid Storm. > https://www.thestar.com/life/parent/2011/05/21/parents_keep_childs_gender_secret.html The idea of letting a kid choose his/her gender role sounds like a good one. In the end, the kid will choose one anyway. I never raised my daughter to be a girly girl. In the end, she chose it for herself. |
Master Bruce <masterbruce@null.null>: Jan 05 08:24AM +1100 On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 12:59:47 -0800 (PST), dsi1 <dsi123@hawaiiantel.net> wrote: >> the kid Storm. >> https://www.thestar.com/life/parent/2011/05/21/parents_keep_childs_gender_secret.html >The idea of letting a kid choose his/her gender role sounds like a good one. In the end, the kid will choose one anyway. I never raised my daughter to be a girly girl. In the end, she chose it for herself. Soon you may hear a knock on the door and a low voice saying "Dad?" |
Hank Rogers <Nospam@invalid.com>: Jan 04 02:35PM -0600 Master Bruce wrote: >> of that dipshit from Hawaii's liquid smoke . For that "real" flavor >> dontchaknow . > Redneck gets worked up about pureness of redneck recipe. <spit> Druce, you must be fried from too much meth. <*SNIFF*> |
Hank Rogers <Nospam@invalid.com>: Jan 04 02:36PM -0600 jmcquown wrote: > On 1/4/2021 2:16 PM, Master Bruce wrote: >> Redneck gets worked up about pureness of redneck recipe. <spit> > <fart> The master will be right there! |
"itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net" <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Jan 04 01:14PM -0800 On Sunday, January 3, 2021 at 4:36:33 PM UTC-6, cshenk wrote: > Joan, I am not going to 'read again your statement'. That you dislike > the name or that we do it that way commonly here, is something that > doesn't fit your concepts. Ok. This doesn't fit anyone's 'concept' of "Southern Pulled Barbecue" and don't claim it does. > recipe. I'll own that the name we use for it in the south offended you > if you will own that the response was a classic reason why people here > do NOT post recipes. You can't have it both ways. Since you are cursed with reading comprehension I'll risk repeating myself ONCE AGAIN. It's probably a great recipe but don't even attempt to call a crockpot pork roast "Southern Pulled Barbecue." If you post a meatloaf recipe and try to pass it off as beef tenderloin I'll call foul on that as well. But you can search high and low and this is just about the only recipe I've ever criticized for claiming it to be something it's not. I am not responsible for what others post claiming it to be when it's genuinely not. You'll have to take that up them. |
"itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net" <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Jan 04 01:17PM -0800 On Sunday, January 3, 2021 at 4:48:01 PM UTC-6, Master Bruce wrote: > >if you will own that the response was a classic reason why people here > >do NOT post recipes. You can't have it both ways. > There you go, Joan. Cornered! Cornered about what?? Show me where I'm cornered. I answered her fair and square and truthfully. If she or you can't accept it that, then y'all will have to deal with my replies best you can. |
"itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net" <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Jan 04 01:20PM -0800 On Monday, January 4, 2021 at 8:28:00 AM UTC-6, Snag wrote: > dontchaknow . > -- > Snag *APPLAUSE* |
Hank Rogers <Nospam@invalid.com>: Jan 04 02:30PM -0600 Master Bruce wrote: >> along a bag of Doritos figuring that the salt would help her retain fluid. > You've just read an excerpt from "Urine and Me, a Journey" by Dave > Smith. And butt sniffing appendix by Master Druce. |
Sheldon Martin <penmart01@aol.com>: Jan 04 03:02PM -0500 On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 Gary wrote: >> spend that much on a single meal :( To me, they are the only crabs >> worth eating. >Sounds like you've just never tried the other kinds of crabs. ALL crabs eat shit and I don't eat shit eaters. ALL catfish eat shit and I don't eat catfish either. |
Master Bruce <masterbruce@null.null>: Jan 05 07:23AM +1100 On Mon, 04 Jan 2021 15:02:13 -0500, Sheldon Martin <penmart01@aol.com> wrote: >>Sounds like you've just never tried the other kinds of crabs. >ALL crabs eat shit and I don't eat shit eaters. >ALL catfish eat shit and I don't eat catfish either. You may not eat it, but you talk it a lot. |
Not At All <not@hearing.it>: Jan 04 12:23PM -0800 On 1/4/2021 10:04 AM, John Kuthe wrote: > I can tell you one thing I will NEVER do again!0 > Guess what it is? ;-) Post something coherent, intelligent, and cooking-related here? One thing you absolutely need to do is fuck off out of here and never return. |
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.food.cooking+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment